2017 International Conference on Microelectronic Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICMDCS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icmdcs.2017.8211697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retina based biometric identification using SURF and ORB feature descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FAR = 0.0%, FRR = 1.19% and ERR = 0.59% [48] Iris [49][50][51] Classification accuracy higher than 99.9%. FAR = 0,00001%, FRR = 0.1% [52] Retina [53,54] The true acceptance rate 98.148% [55] Face [56,57] FAR = 0,1%, FRR = 7% [52] Keystroke dynamics [58][59][60] Classification accuracy 92.60% [61] Signature dynamics [62,63] Average FAR = 5.125%, FRR = 5.5%, AER = 5.31% [64] Speech [65][66][67] Classification accuracy up to 99%. EER = 1% [68] The analysis of the presented values of the accuracy of authentication does not allow us to speak of a single use of features, however, it makes relevant their use within multimodal authentication (for example, face + iris [69], face and vein arrangement on finger, fingerprint, and voice [70], complex parameters of fingers and palms [71,72]) and the construction of ensembles of various types [73,74].…”
Section: Biometric Characteristic Papers Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAR = 0.0%, FRR = 1.19% and ERR = 0.59% [48] Iris [49][50][51] Classification accuracy higher than 99.9%. FAR = 0,00001%, FRR = 0.1% [52] Retina [53,54] The true acceptance rate 98.148% [55] Face [56,57] FAR = 0,1%, FRR = 7% [52] Keystroke dynamics [58][59][60] Classification accuracy 92.60% [61] Signature dynamics [62,63] Average FAR = 5.125%, FRR = 5.5%, AER = 5.31% [64] Speech [65][66][67] Classification accuracy up to 99%. EER = 1% [68] The analysis of the presented values of the accuracy of authentication does not allow us to speak of a single use of features, however, it makes relevant their use within multimodal authentication (for example, face + iris [69], face and vein arrangement on finger, fingerprint, and voice [70], complex parameters of fingers and palms [71,72]) and the construction of ensembles of various types [73,74].…”
Section: Biometric Characteristic Papers Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metode Speed Up Robust Feature (SURF) merupakan salah satu metode yang digunakan untuk mengekstraksi ciri dari sebuah citra. Metode SURF telah banyak digunakan untuk mengekstraksi ciri dari sebuah citra untuk kebutuhan identifikasi [1]- [6].…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Examples include a fingerprint scanner in [10], such a system is reported to achieve false rejection rate (FRR) less than 4.12% when restricting the false acceptance rate (FAR) to 0.01%. Another biometric-based identification scheme is the retina scanners in [11], which achieves a 0% FAR and 1.85% FRR. These systems recognise the user through their body, removing the risk of stolen data or keys, as well as the risk of a password being guessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%