Schalm's Veterinary Hematology 2022
DOI: 10.1002/9781119500537.ch23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reticulocyte and Heinz Body Staining and Enumeration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning intra‐assay variability, despite the ProCyte Dx counting reticulocytes in absolute numbers and not in percentages, its precision was poor on samples with low reticulocyte percentages, similar to what was recorded for manual counts. Since, especially in manual counts, the reticulocyte percentage is used to calculate the number of reticulocytes, which, according to the current literature, allows identification of the regenerative response, this variability could potentially cause a shift in the classification from regenerative to non‐regenerative anaemia and affect clinical decisions 1,14 . However, the high variability at low reticulocyte percentage values was not unexpected, since CVs were similar to those reported with other automated haematological analysers 15,16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning intra‐assay variability, despite the ProCyte Dx counting reticulocytes in absolute numbers and not in percentages, its precision was poor on samples with low reticulocyte percentages, similar to what was recorded for manual counts. Since, especially in manual counts, the reticulocyte percentage is used to calculate the number of reticulocytes, which, according to the current literature, allows identification of the regenerative response, this variability could potentially cause a shift in the classification from regenerative to non‐regenerative anaemia and affect clinical decisions 1,14 . However, the high variability at low reticulocyte percentage values was not unexpected, since CVs were similar to those reported with other automated haematological analysers 15,16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the current study, however, the comparison with manual aggregate counts revealed a significant difference and a proportional bias, contrary to what was observed with our total reticulocyte count. Again, this may in part be explained by the subjective classification of aggregate or punctate reticulocytes, but it may also depend on the inclusion of some punctate reticulocytes in the automated reticulocyte counts, as hypothesised by other authors for both canine and feline samples 1,21,22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations