2020
DOI: 10.1163/18725465-01201001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reticent Digital Diasporas in Times of Crisis

Abstract: Based on fieldwork amongst Burundians in Rwanda, the Netherlands and Belgium, this article explores how information circulates transnationally in times of political and violent crisis and how ordinary members of the diaspora seek to manage these flows of information. Our main argument is that conflict in the homeland creates a massive flow of information across various digital platforms and that while members of the diaspora eagerly take part in consuming and sharing this information, they do so reticently. Ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These three examples can all be read in the context of changing digital environments, both in Mauritius and around the globe. As Mauritius hovers between democracy and autocracy, it is worth placing this research in dialogue with powerful literatures on authoritarian regimes and media control (Pype 2021a; 2021b; Turner and Berkmoes 2020; Ekdale and Tully 2020) and digital publics (Srinivasan et al . 2019), with literature expressing the potential for internet access to contribute to robust institutions and democracy (Bernal 2014; 2020; Nyabola 2018; 2021), and, of course, at times all of the above (De Bruijn 2019).…”
Section: The Best Loser System and Conscripting Communalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three examples can all be read in the context of changing digital environments, both in Mauritius and around the globe. As Mauritius hovers between democracy and autocracy, it is worth placing this research in dialogue with powerful literatures on authoritarian regimes and media control (Pype 2021a; 2021b; Turner and Berkmoes 2020; Ekdale and Tully 2020) and digital publics (Srinivasan et al . 2019), with literature expressing the potential for internet access to contribute to robust institutions and democracy (Bernal 2014; 2020; Nyabola 2018; 2021), and, of course, at times all of the above (De Bruijn 2019).…”
Section: The Best Loser System and Conscripting Communalismmentioning
confidence: 99%