2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Standards: Nutrient Reduction or Nutrient Control?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wastewater ammonium is microbially converted to N 2 by nitrification and denitrification, a process that requires careful tuning of facility operations (37). However, removing P from municipal wastewater is a simpler and more effective process involving coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation (38). Thus, average removal efficiency from municipal wastewater by WWTPs is as high as 90% for TP, but less so (60% to 70%) for TN, resulting in the WWTP effluent with much higher TN/TP mass ratios (median, 23.2; 95% CI, 14.7 to 37.0) than the influent (median, 8.9; 95% CI, 7.0 to 11.1; P < 0.01, t test; SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Response Of Lake Nutrient Regime To Shifting Anthropogenicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wastewater ammonium is microbially converted to N 2 by nitrification and denitrification, a process that requires careful tuning of facility operations (37). However, removing P from municipal wastewater is a simpler and more effective process involving coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation (38). Thus, average removal efficiency from municipal wastewater by WWTPs is as high as 90% for TP, but less so (60% to 70%) for TN, resulting in the WWTP effluent with much higher TN/TP mass ratios (median, 23.2; 95% CI, 14.7 to 37.0) than the influent (median, 8.9; 95% CI, 7.0 to 11.1; P < 0.01, t test; SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Response Of Lake Nutrient Regime To Shifting Anthropogenicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve coherent and sustainable wastewater management, potential ecological consequences induced by N overenrichment relative to P in aquatic ecology will require consideration in future sanitation approaches in which N and P removals are considered in a holistic way. Possible short-term strategies could include refining operations of existing facilities (40), developing more efficient N-removal technologies (37), and introducing new standards setting TN/TP ratio targets for effluent discharge (38). In the longer term, increasing nutrient recovery from municipal wastewater along with source separation of human excrement may also be promising (2)(3)(4)41).…”
Section: Response Of Lake Nutrient Regime To Shifting Anthropogenicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of improved sanitation infrastructure to controlling nutrient discharges and the spread of diseases in less-developed countries has been recognised by the international community in the coverage targets set by the UN Agenda 2030 26 . Continuous efforts have been made by the wastewater industry to satisfy the regulations limiting point-source nutrient discharge 9 . Figure 4 shows that sanitation usage, the prevalence of nutrient removal facilities (at least secondary treatment), and nutrient removal efficiency are the factors that stimulate the strengthening and reshuffling of the environmental impact hotspots in a relatively straightforward manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant investments have been made in the wastewater industry to meet the regulations restricting point-source nutrient discharge 8 . In most developing countries, these regulations are consensus-based, emissions standards set at a generic level 9 . In parts of the developed world, such as Australia, Europe, and North America, where eutrophication is of particular concern 10 , more-stringent standards have been implemented to regulate nutrient removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threshold concentration of the range between 0.21-1.2 mg L −1 and 0.01-0.1 mg L −1 of total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP), respectively, responsible for causing the eutrophication, was evaluated by Chambers et al (2012). Mostly, P is considered as the rate limiting nutrient for phytoplankton growth; hence, for mitigating the eutrophication, there is a need to reduce the input of Phosphorous into the receiving systems (Hendriks and Langeveld, 2017). For example, in Denmark, a TP effluent concentration of 0.3 mg L −1 is applied to all municipal treatment facilities, whereas in Sweden a 90% reduction is required (compared to 80% reduction in relation to the load of the influent stated by the UWTD).…”
Section: The Integrated Bacterial-microalgal Approach For Treatment O...mentioning
confidence: 99%