2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking user based innovation: Assessing public and professional perceptions of energy efficient building facades in Greece, Italy and Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further investigation using a Chi-square test confirmed that people with MSc/PhD education are more likely to be very knowledgeable about domestic energy-saving x 2 (11.089, p< .01). As expected and in line with the findings of [50], the vast majority of respondents (83%) felt responsible for saving energy (figure 8). After conducting a Chis-square test, it was found that people claiming to have a good/ very good knowledge are more likely to feel responsible about reducing their energy usage x 2 (6.275, p< .012) which was in agreement with the findings of [51].…”
Section: Environmental Knowledge and Awareness Of The Participants And Their Familiarity With Ictsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Further investigation using a Chi-square test confirmed that people with MSc/PhD education are more likely to be very knowledgeable about domestic energy-saving x 2 (11.089, p< .01). As expected and in line with the findings of [50], the vast majority of respondents (83%) felt responsible for saving energy (figure 8). After conducting a Chis-square test, it was found that people claiming to have a good/ very good knowledge are more likely to feel responsible about reducing their energy usage x 2 (6.275, p< .012) which was in agreement with the findings of [51].…”
Section: Environmental Knowledge and Awareness Of The Participants And Their Familiarity With Ictsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Firstly, technical problems -lack of skilled workforce (Galvin and Sunikka-Blank (2013); Weiss, Dunkelberg and Vogelpohl, 2012), poor accessibility to skilled workers (Neuhoff et al, 2011;Sebi et al, 2019), lack of collaboration between differently skilled workers (Galvin and Sunikka-Blank, 2017); and difficulty in identifying which retrofit measures apply to individual properties (Wu et al, 2017). Secondly, financial problems -initial investments are unaffordable (Myhren et al, 2018;Ortiz, Caquero-Modrego and Salom, 2019;Tsoka et al, 2018); there is uncertainty around investment returns (Galvin, 2012), and there is a lack of financial support (Sebi et al, 2019). Thirdly, management problems -tensions can arise between landlords and tenants if the property owner is unwilling to invest in high energy-efficiency retrofits; this means tenants are unable to benefit from lower energy bills and more sustainable living (Lang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Suburban Retrofitting In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, community acceptance should be viewed according to specific sectors and disciplines [27]. In the housing sector, community acceptance is shaped by factors associated with the information made available to users, public involvement in the projects, residents' trust in developers during the project development, and the anticipation of projects, including risks and benefits [33]. In cases where the installation of new technologies in social housing is decided by governmental policy instead of a decision by the residents, efforts are needed to inform and involve them regarding the benefits of technologies to avoid abandonment and replacement [29].…”
Section: Community Acceptance Of Sustainable Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%