2017
DOI: 10.1177/2043820617717847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking the subject, reimagining worlds

Abstract: The ecological crisis is also an ontological crisis. It raises questions about our ethical response-ability to this world, calling for a rethinking of the human–nature divide. Vitalist approaches and scholarship on the affective turn have shifted our understanding of our relations to nonhuman others, but they remain constrained: limited to proximate attachments; ambivalent or agnostic in the face of conflict; unable to move beyond the celebration of a lively earth. At issue I feel is a methodological individua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is simultaneously an epoch, epistemological style, and an ontological condition (Ginn 2017). Within Canadian geography, posthumanist analyses have drawn on varied sub-disciplines, theories, and philosophical underpinnings including Indigenous knowledges (Sundberg 2014;Hoogeveen 2016;Yates et al 2017;Vannini and Vannini 2019); feminist performativity theory (Geiger and Hovorka 2015;Mathews 2018); (neo)vitalism philosophies (Ruddick 2010); non-/more-than-representational theories (Hall and Wilton 2016;Andrews 2018b;Vannini and Vannini 2018); Foucauldian analyses of governmentality theory on biopolitics and biopower (e.g., Blue and Rock 2011;Collard 2012); queer theory (e.g., Nash and Gorman-Murray 2017); and assemblage and actor-network theories (e.g., Lepawsky and Mather 2011;Andrews 2018a;Evans et al 2019). Moreover, "rhizomatic networks" of posthuman theoretical knowledge in Canadian geography have been cultivated in and around various institutions.…”
Section: Posthumanism In Canadian Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is simultaneously an epoch, epistemological style, and an ontological condition (Ginn 2017). Within Canadian geography, posthumanist analyses have drawn on varied sub-disciplines, theories, and philosophical underpinnings including Indigenous knowledges (Sundberg 2014;Hoogeveen 2016;Yates et al 2017;Vannini and Vannini 2019); feminist performativity theory (Geiger and Hovorka 2015;Mathews 2018); (neo)vitalism philosophies (Ruddick 2010); non-/more-than-representational theories (Hall and Wilton 2016;Andrews 2018b;Vannini and Vannini 2018); Foucauldian analyses of governmentality theory on biopolitics and biopower (e.g., Blue and Rock 2011;Collard 2012); queer theory (e.g., Nash and Gorman-Murray 2017); and assemblage and actor-network theories (e.g., Lepawsky and Mather 2011;Andrews 2018a;Evans et al 2019). Moreover, "rhizomatic networks" of posthuman theoretical knowledge in Canadian geography have been cultivated in and around various institutions.…”
Section: Posthumanism In Canadian Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent special issue on the subject of affective ecologies and conservation, Singh (2018) notes that while the turn towards affect theory in geography and related disciplines has grown exponentially in the past two decades, a concern remains that ''the affective turn can lead to an apolitical focus on biophysical processes or on proximate attachments that neglect the complex histories, cultures, and issues of conflict and incompatibility'' (2). Approaching photovoice as a means of attuning to conservation's affects also becomes a means of responding to criticisms that more-than-human and posthuman-inflected research ignores pressing questions of politics and justice in favor of attention to the affects of individual beings and the ''liveliness'' of things (for a review of these debates, see Braun, 2015;Fraser, 1997;Panelli, 2010;Ruddick, 2010Ruddick, , 2017Singh, 2018).…”
Section: Collaboratingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interventions that follow explore some techniques for moving forward with these key tenets in a research setting. This is significant in the current climate of political and ecological crises; in the geographic literature, it is becoming increasingly apparent that such Anthropocenic concerns require a fresh approach to ecological thought that extends “collaborations far beyond the realm of human relationships” (Ruddick, , p. 120). Our minor contribution is in further emphasising in each of the following papers how forces and processes can be brought into collaboration beyond a particular humanist reduction of subjectivity, that is, before a reasoning subject as the master of making sense and outlining actions.…”
Section: Key Tenetsmentioning
confidence: 99%