Rethinking the ontology of peacebuilding. Gender, spaces and the limits of the local turn

Rigual, Christelle

doi:10.1080/21647259.2018.1453640

Cited by 20 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some attempted to summarise the essentials of peacebuilding including Chetail and Jütersonke (2015) who have conducted a comprehensive review of the existing literature on peacebuilding, and Keethaponcalan (2020) who has made a concise review of the literature focusing on the situation in Asia. Rigual (2018), on the other hand, has offered re-thinking of the ontologies of peacebuilding. The following does not aim to recapitulate these previous accounts and instead seeks to provide excerpts of some commonly discussed dimensions of peacebuilding to serve as a backgrounder for the later discussion on hybrid peacebuilding in this study.…”

Section: Theory and Practice Of Peacebuildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another useful definition is provided by Interpeace (2015: 2), which defines peacebuilding as "local and national capacities for peace (values and attitudes; social processes and relationships; political and social institutions) necessary to incrementally and effectively overcome the dynamics of conflict that lead to polarisation, violence and destruction". Rigual (2018) presented a summary of trends in peacebuilding by categorising its theory and practice into various discourses, of which four are particularly prominent: (1) economic, (2) liberal, (3) critical, and (4) feminist peacebuilding. Among them, critical peacebuilding continues to attract the largest audience in academia and the main strand of discussion on hybrid peacebuilding falls into this classification.…”

Section: Theory and Practice Of Peacebuildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cockburn (2004: 43) proposes that "gender links violence at different points on a scale reaching from the personal to the international". This thinking is highlighted by the fact that women experience violence in different ways than men both during times of war and peace (Rigual 2018). For example, men often make up the majority of homicide victims, while women tend to be the main victims of intimate partner homicide (Geneva Declaration 2015).…”

Section: Feminist Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Brief Sketch of Hybrid Peacebuilding

Uesugi

Deekeling

Ingstedt

2021

Operationalisation of Hybrid Peacebuilding in Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This opening literature review connects hybrid calls and criticisms to the development of peacebuilding debates at large. First, it briefly presents some of peacebuilding’s ontological aspects, as they may be found both in academia and practice. With such a contrasting framework at hand, the following section explains some core arguments in the existing literature in favour of adopting hybrid peacebuilding. Lastly, voices are raised to show how hybridity has been criticised both within its own circles and by others. Showcasing the various aspects of peacebuilding, and hybridity specifically, this chapter sets the stage for a new set of discussions in the subsequent chapters.

show abstract

Section: Theory and Practice Of Peacebuildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theory and Practice Of Peacebuildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Feminist Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Brief Sketch of Hybrid Peacebuilding

Uesugi

Deekeling

Ingstedt

2021

Operationalisation of Hybrid Peacebuilding in Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…So wurden globale Partnerschaften zu friedenspolitischen Fragen zwischen Forschenden in der Schweiz und in Ländern wie Ägypten, Elfenbeinküste, Ghana, Guatemala, Indien, Indonesien, Nigeria, Sambia und Südsudan ermöglicht. Geforscht wird zum Beispiel zu ethnischen Machtbeziehungen und Konflikten in fragilen Kontexten (Kapesa et al 2016;Mukunto 2016;Vogt 2018), zur Wissensproduktion in der Friedensförderung (Palmer et al 2015;Logo 2018) K oder zur Gender-Dimension von sozialen Konflikten, bewaffneter Gewalt und der Friedensförderung (Zalewski et al 2017;Rigual 2018).…”

Section: Internationale Einbettungunclassified

Friedens- und Konfliktforschung in der Schweiz: ein facettenreiches Patchwork

Goetschel

Hellmüller

2019

Z Friedens und Konflforsch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Friedens-und Konfliktforschung e.V. (AFK) und die Autoren. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com".

show abstract

“…(Björkdahl and Kappler 2017;Bräuchler 2018;Leonardsson and Rudd 2015;Mac Ginty 2014;Mac Ginty and Richmond 2013). In addition, some have questioned the ontology of peacebuilding, suggesting a radically new gaze (Millar 2018a;Rigual 2018). These lines of critique all clamor to claim space in both academic theorizing and in guiding policy.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction – Peacebuilding Amidst Violence

Öjendal

Bachmann

Stern

et al. 2021

Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a literature-reviewing and conceptualizing article introducing a Special Issue that is addressing the broad field of 'peacebuilding amidst violence'. We take as a point of departure that peacebuilding (as we know it) is widely failing to deliver on its promises. Moreover, the atypical nature and persistence of violence in post-war phases are further undermining the prospect of linear transition from war to peace as typically expected in peacebuilding ventures. We extend, however, our argument and claim that in spite of creative 'turns', the concept has exhausted its adaptive capacity, and both conceptually and empirically has few options left. We investigate the three possible, as we see it, remaining options, which all include paradigmatic changes, namely the closure of, the refusal of the failure of, and the reenacting of, peacebuilding. Although the 're-enacting' is the preferred way forward for the authors of this introductory article, it rather opens up for the ensuing articles presented in the issue than concludes of the desirability and feasibility of that path.

show abstract

Rethinking the ontology of peacebuilding. Gender, spaces and the limits of the local turn

Cited by 20 publications

References 0 publications

A Brief Sketch of Hybrid Peacebuilding

A Brief Sketch of Hybrid Peacebuilding

Friedens- und Konfliktforschung in der Schweiz: ein facettenreiches Patchwork

Introduction – Peacebuilding Amidst Violence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About