Rethinking the Legacies of Bandung Conference: Global Decolonization and the Making of Modern International Order

Abstract

This article aims to investigate the extent to which the Bandung Conference affected the international order after the Second World War. By locating the Bandung Conference in the international order transition between 1945 until 1970, I argue that the Bandung Conference should not be treated as merely a milestone of historic anti‐colonial struggles but also a site for the emergence of a modern international order. The Bandung Conference played a key role in shaping the Westphalian interstate system that acknowledges equal sovereignty among states in world politics. From this viewpoint, this article argues that the legacy of the Bandung Conference lies in its role to mediate the transition from colonial order before the Second World War to the modern international order, which is based on sovereignty and equal status among states as the primary members. It does so by putting forward an agenda for global decolonization and delegitimizes the practices of colonialism. The diplomatic struggle after the Bandung Conference continued until the UN Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples in 1960, which further locates the contribution of the Bandung Conference to the making of the modern international order as we know it in the present day.

‘Which Part of Your Work is IR?’ on Western Dominance and the Discipline of International Relations in Indonesia

“…The study of International Relations, originally, served as ideological tool not only to understand world politics, but also to provide critical understanding of the world that is also relevant to inform policymakers on what should be done in dealing with global political dynamics, especially to support Indonesia’s diplomatic activism at that time. As I have discussed elsewhere (Umar, 2019a), Indonesia has also contributed to the transformation to international order through the Bandung Conference and UN Decolonization Resolution (1960). Regarding this, during Sukarno era, the University also became a training site for diplomats, who were to be sent to diplomatic posts in embassies or international organizations, which made IR important to provide knowledge for diplomat training in Indonesia (Fakih, 2020, Wicaksana 2018).…”

The triple problem displacement: Climate change and the politics of the Great Acceleration

“…As decolonization proceeded further and post-colonial states were established, new actors made claims for global solidarity and political responsibility for colonialism (see recently Getachew, 2019). The Asian-African (Bandung) conference of 1955 (e.g., Umar, 2019), the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) created in 1964 and the New International Economic Order (NIEO), approved by the UN General Assembly in 1974 (e.g., Gilman, 2015; for part of the debate Marklund, 2020), were key foci for this attempted re-interpretation of global politics. However, these attempts were largely rejected or only formally accepted by the Western powers.…”

Three Concepts of Internationalism in the Global South: Solidarism, Pluralism, and Developmentalism

“…The idea of peaceful coexistence attracted many supporters in the post-colonial world, as it allowed them to escape from the confrontational atmosphere of the Cold War. This sentiment was soon formalized into a concrete political project, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM).On the other hand, the 'Bandung Spirit' did not flourish as expected in the decades after the conference Umar (2019). identified several reasons, including the domestic po-litical changes in many states in the Global South in the 1960s, the post-colonial world's shift of focus from independence to development, and the escalation of the US-Soviet Union confrontation, which had dragged many Third World states into it.…”