2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: On the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
183
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
183
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Each respondent needs to be represented multiple times in the analysis, once for each of the parties analyzed (e.g., Banducci et al, 2017; Barabas & Jerit, 2009; van der Eijk, Franklin, & Oppenhuis, 1996; van der Eijk, van der Brug, Kroh, & Franklin, 2006). We achieve this by stacking the data in a way that respondents are represented for the respective parties, in our case four times.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each respondent needs to be represented multiple times in the analysis, once for each of the parties analyzed (e.g., Banducci et al, 2017; Barabas & Jerit, 2009; van der Eijk, Franklin, & Oppenhuis, 1996; van der Eijk, van der Brug, Kroh, & Franklin, 2006). We achieve this by stacking the data in a way that respondents are represented for the respective parties, in our case four times.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although vote propensity scores do not explicitly refer to a person's vote intention in the current election, they nevertheless correlate extremely strongly with actual vote choice (Van Der Eijk et al 2006). This was true also in the 2007 Swiss elections.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Moreover, vote choice is difficult to code in Switzerland because panachage allows voters to cast votes for more than one party. For all of these reasons, this article does not focus on vote choice but on a proxy -vote propensity (Van Der Eijk et al 2006). Vote propensities capture a person's inclination to vote for a particular political party.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A promising candidate to become the dependent variable is the propensity to vote (henceforth PTV) for the main parties that ran in the 2006 Italian National Elections (Tillie, 1995;van der Eijk and Franklin, 1996;van der Eijk et al, 2006). ITANES (2006) presents the classical formulation of the question: respondents are asked to indicate, on an 11-point scale, how likely it is that they will ever vote for several parties and for the two coalitions that ran in the 2006 elections, l'Unione and la Casa delle Libertà.…”
Section: Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%