2006
DOI: 10.1177/016146810610801204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Terrestrial Pedagogy: Nature, Cultures, and Ethics

Abstract: In this article, I offer a clarification of the ambiguities surrounding the pivotal concepts that have shaped and will continue to shape environmental education movement in the United States and beyond: nature, conservation, sustainable development, and environmental justice. I point out that dualistic frameworks not only polarize environmental educators’ ethical, political, and pedagogical values but also oversimplify complicated ecological issues. It is critical to generate inclusive and collective pedagogic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion aligns with broader concerns emerging in discussions of climate ethics beyond the field of educational technology that recognize that although the whole earth community experiences the realities of climate change and ecological crisis, the nations of the Global North have disproportionately contributed to this problem while the nations of the Global South have disproportionately borne its consequences (Adger & Nelson, 2010; Boff, 1995; Iheka, 2021; Krakoff, 2011; Li, 2006, 2011; Martusewicz et al, 2021; Roberts & Parks, 2010; Rozenberg & Hallegatte, 2018; St Clair, 2010; Williston, 2018). The danger is that this distance between the actions and the environmental consequences of governments, corporations and consumers in the Global North can functionally push anthropogenic environmental destruction “out of sight and out of mind” for those who contribute the most to it.…”
Section: Discussion: Expanding the Discipline's Focussupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This conclusion aligns with broader concerns emerging in discussions of climate ethics beyond the field of educational technology that recognize that although the whole earth community experiences the realities of climate change and ecological crisis, the nations of the Global North have disproportionately contributed to this problem while the nations of the Global South have disproportionately borne its consequences (Adger & Nelson, 2010; Boff, 1995; Iheka, 2021; Krakoff, 2011; Li, 2006, 2011; Martusewicz et al, 2021; Roberts & Parks, 2010; Rozenberg & Hallegatte, 2018; St Clair, 2010; Williston, 2018). The danger is that this distance between the actions and the environmental consequences of governments, corporations and consumers in the Global North can functionally push anthropogenic environmental destruction “out of sight and out of mind” for those who contribute the most to it.…”
Section: Discussion: Expanding the Discipline's Focussupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In point of fact, the concept of "nature" has played a key role in shaping the development of an environmental education that aims to re-affirm the organic connections between humans and nature. 26 Huey-li Li doi: 10.47925/73.321…”
Section: Engaging Vulnerability and Ecologizing Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%