Sovereign Debt Diplomacies 2021
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198866350.003.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Sovereign Debt from Colonial Empires to Hegemony

Abstract: This descriptive chapter identifies the available narratives on the evolution of sovereign debt across the four historical clusters we have chosen to examine and show how this volume updates and complements existing research. Consistent with the diplomatic framework outlined in the introduction, we survey patterns of similarities and differences between clusters in terms of risk analysis, legal clauses, bargaining power, and conceptions of state responsibility. Our periodization will not surprise the reader in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a literature review, seePanizza et al (2009).8 Cases of gunboat diplomacy were particularly relevant for the US as a creditor country during the early 20 th century. SeeMitchener and Weidenmier (2010) andPénet and Flores Zendejas (2021) for a different perspective.Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a literature review, seePanizza et al (2009).8 Cases of gunboat diplomacy were particularly relevant for the US as a creditor country during the early 20 th century. SeeMitchener and Weidenmier (2010) andPénet and Flores Zendejas (2021) for a different perspective.Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 Cases of gunboat diplomacy were particularly relevant for the US as a creditor country during the early 20 th century. See Mitchener and Weidenmier (2010) and Pénet and Flores Zendejas (2021) for a different perspective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%