2017
DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking safety in numbers: are intersections with more crossing pedestrians really safer?

Abstract: Conclusions on the safety in numbers effect based on a cross-sectional analysis should be reached with great caution. The safety of individual pedestrians can be measured based on the crash risk, whereas the safety of road facilities for pedestrians should be determined by the environmental hazards of walking. Intersections prevalent of pedestrians do not always exhibit favourable safety performance. Relative to increasing the number of pedestrians, safety strategies should focus on reducing environmental haza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information from 3 studies is about the safety in Parts of Roadways provided in different parts of China (Bian et al 2020;Ma, Lu and Zhang 2020;Jiang et al 2018). Hong Kong-based two studies mentioned safety for pedestrians of Specific Areas (Leung and Loo 2020;Guo et al 2017) and one study for Parts of Roadways (Xu et al, 2017). The review includes 3 South Korea based studies, two of which fall under the theme 'Parts of Roadways' (Choi et al, 2019;Kim, Kim and Lee, 2016), and one study falls under the theme 'Specific Areas' (Choi, Yoon and Jung 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information from 3 studies is about the safety in Parts of Roadways provided in different parts of China (Bian et al 2020;Ma, Lu and Zhang 2020;Jiang et al 2018). Hong Kong-based two studies mentioned safety for pedestrians of Specific Areas (Leung and Loo 2020;Guo et al 2017) and one study for Parts of Roadways (Xu et al, 2017). The review includes 3 South Korea based studies, two of which fall under the theme 'Parts of Roadways' (Choi et al, 2019;Kim, Kim and Lee, 2016), and one study falls under the theme 'Specific Areas' (Choi, Yoon and Jung 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potential under-reporting of less severe injuries [36], it is the only representative data source publicly available for such a long-time span. The same dataset is also readily used by local authorities for safety policymaking [6,8,10,29,30,47,48]. One major challenge to quantifying the danger of cycling is the lack of reliable data on exposure [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained crash data from the Traffic Road Accident Database, which is maintained by the Hong Kong Police Force and the Hong Kong Transport Department [10]. These data are routinely collected by the police at the scenes of crashes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing number of traffic crashes occurring in the past decade, both researchers and practitioners in the road safety field have been focusing on topics such as crash risks, severity levels, and safety behaviors to propose prevention measures for alleviating social and economic losses [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Some scholars are focused on investigating the risk factors and severity levels of crashes in specific scenarios, as the mechanisms of crashes may vary considerably in different situations, e.g., with different traffic conditions, involving different numbers of vehicles, or caused by different at-fault driver groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%