2008
DOI: 10.17953/amer.34.3.y08124j33ut846v0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Residential Assimilation: The Case of a Chinese Ethnoburb in the San Gabriel Valley, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of Chinese settlement in California have shown that even Chinese immigrants who are financially able to residentially integrate into other neighborhoods often choose to live among others of the same ethnicity. This means that Chinese immigrants’ first neighborhood of residence is often their final, desired destination (Walton, 2015) and Chinese immigrants usually settle in urban contexts (Zhou, Tseng, & Kim, 2008). Although some highly educated new Chinese immigrants bypass inner cities to settle in the suburbs, traditional Chinatowns continue to receive newcomers and have expanded in recent years (Lin, 1998; Zhou et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyses of Chinese settlement in California have shown that even Chinese immigrants who are financially able to residentially integrate into other neighborhoods often choose to live among others of the same ethnicity. This means that Chinese immigrants’ first neighborhood of residence is often their final, desired destination (Walton, 2015) and Chinese immigrants usually settle in urban contexts (Zhou, Tseng, & Kim, 2008). Although some highly educated new Chinese immigrants bypass inner cities to settle in the suburbs, traditional Chinatowns continue to receive newcomers and have expanded in recent years (Lin, 1998; Zhou et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that Chinese immigrants’ first neighborhood of residence is often their final, desired destination (Walton, 2015) and Chinese immigrants usually settle in urban contexts (Zhou, Tseng, & Kim, 2008). Although some highly educated new Chinese immigrants bypass inner cities to settle in the suburbs, traditional Chinatowns continue to receive newcomers and have expanded in recent years (Lin, 1998; Zhou et al, 2008). The long history of Chinese settlement in the US, combined with historical discrimination against Chinese people (Tsai, 1986), means that ‘Chinatowns’ are often in polluted central city districts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This alternative is further supported by another finding, that global neighborhoods tend to be relatively affluent, therefore neither in the inner ring suburbs that whites are leaving nor in the inner city. The literature on “ethnoburbs” with large Asian minorities (Li 1998; Zhou 2010; Zhou and Logan 1989; Zhou, Tseng, and Kim 2008) illustrates such a pattern.…”
Section: Components Of the Spatial Pattern: Centrality And Adjacencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a number of authors have argued for a rethinking of residential assimilation theories linked to the 'classical inner-city-to-suburbia residential mobility model' (Zhou et al 2008). This challenge has largely focused on the concept of an ethnoburb, introduced by Li (1998) to represent recent Chinese settlement in the US, and later extended to a number of other Pacific Rim countries (Li 2006a: just before Li's first paper appeared, Zhou (1997) identified the settlement pattern now categorised as ethnoburbs as one of the anomalies from the classical socio-spatial assimilation model, including it as an exemplar of the general process that Portes and Zhou (1993) had earlier termed 'segmented assimilation').…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, as Zhou et al (2008) describe a Californian Chinese ethnoburb, such clustering involves the creation of not only ethnic enclave economies but also institutions promoting ethnic social capital which act as magnets for some migrants who are often more visible in such neighbourhoods than their relative proportion of the total population suggests, partly because their cultural distinctiveness is reflected in the townscape (Dunn and Roberts 2006;Wood 2006). Furthermore, they suggest that although the residential areas are relatively mixed, the degree of inter-ethnic social interaction within them is not high, sustaining Zelinsky and Lee's argument that propinquity is no longer a major determinant of sociospatial behaviour (as illustrated by Ley's 2008, study of immigrant churches in Vancouver).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%