2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking knowledge systems for urban resilience: Feminist and decolonial contributions to just transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the risk of property damage to households and public facilities was regarded as both important and difficult to monitor because of questions of correlation and causation of socioeconomic outcomes and specific shoreline features. Differing ontological, epistemological, and ethical commitments (or starting points) across disciplines here led to contrasting interpretations of what and how to monitor the resilience of shorelines (Wijsman and Feagan 2019); yet these foundational differences were hard to address given the separation of TWG by disciplinary areas (ecological, technical, social) and the foundational assumption of epistemological commensurability, which especially in the highly diverse social sciences is not a given. Overall, the effort required constant interpretation, translation, and communication across disciplinary and sectoral boundaries, necessitating interdisciplinary teams with staff expertise in coordination and time and resources to spend toward these activities.…”
Section: Five Characteristics and Challenges To Operationalizing Shoreline Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the risk of property damage to households and public facilities was regarded as both important and difficult to monitor because of questions of correlation and causation of socioeconomic outcomes and specific shoreline features. Differing ontological, epistemological, and ethical commitments (or starting points) across disciplines here led to contrasting interpretations of what and how to monitor the resilience of shorelines (Wijsman and Feagan 2019); yet these foundational differences were hard to address given the separation of TWG by disciplinary areas (ecological, technical, social) and the foundational assumption of epistemological commensurability, which especially in the highly diverse social sciences is not a given. Overall, the effort required constant interpretation, translation, and communication across disciplinary and sectoral boundaries, necessitating interdisciplinary teams with staff expertise in coordination and time and resources to spend toward these activities.…”
Section: Five Characteristics and Challenges To Operationalizing Shoreline Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parte de las críticas sobre este concepto es que promueve el statu quo, en tanto la finalidad es poner en práctica la capacidad para regresar al estado previo de un impacto (Diprose, 2015). Sin embargo, la academia ha integrado la adaptación transformativa al discurso de la resiliencia con el entendimiento de que, entre otras cosas, las comunidades participan de los esfuerzos de adaptación que permiten cambiar las circunstancias de riesgos a las que están expuestas (Wijsman y Feagan, 2019).…”
Section: Conceptualizaciones De Resiliencia En Las Medidas Legislativasunclassified
“…In the academy, feminism operates as a theoretical framework in numerous fields. These include such disparate disciplines as feminist criticism, which looks at "the ways in which literature reinforces or undermines the economic, political, social, and psychological oppression of women" (Tyson, 2006) and urban planning, for instance in examining feminist and decolonial contributions to knowledge systems for urban resilience (Wijsman & Feagan, 2019).…”
Section: Feminist Studies and Practice Within Information Architecture And Related Disciplinesmentioning
confidence: 99%