2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking John Snow's South London study: A Bayesian evaluation and recalculation

Abstract: Famously, John Snow attempted to convince a critical professional audience that public water supplied to South London residents by private companies was a principal vector for the transmission of cholera. The result has been called the sine qua non of the ''epidemiological imagination,'' a landmark study still taught today. In fact, Snow twice attempted to prove public water supplies spread cholera to the South London population. His first, published in 1855, suffered from an incomplete data set that limited i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the 1850’s, John Snow traced the source of a London cholera outbreak to the public water supply, but had no ‘mechanistic’ explanation for it – this lack of understanding of germ theory at that time (i.e. the absence of a mechanism) did not change the fact that an infectious agent was responsible, and that the city’s water pump should be disassembled for the purpose of protecting public health [169]. Thus, regardless of whether we can explain the mechanistic underpinnings of each NMDRC, and at what level of biological complexity they are best understood, their existence alone challenges traditional means of risk assessment.…”
Section: 3 Issue # 3: Debate Surrounding Non-monotonicity In Edc Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the 1850’s, John Snow traced the source of a London cholera outbreak to the public water supply, but had no ‘mechanistic’ explanation for it – this lack of understanding of germ theory at that time (i.e. the absence of a mechanism) did not change the fact that an infectious agent was responsible, and that the city’s water pump should be disassembled for the purpose of protecting public health [169]. Thus, regardless of whether we can explain the mechanistic underpinnings of each NMDRC, and at what level of biological complexity they are best understood, their existence alone challenges traditional means of risk assessment.…”
Section: 3 Issue # 3: Debate Surrounding Non-monotonicity In Edc Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of BA can be seen in mathematics, statistics, computer science, bioinformatics, economics, physics, ecosystem, parasitology, and epidemiology as well as in human and veterinary medicine (Ashby and Smith, 2000;Basáñez et al, 2004;Dowd and Meyer, 2003;Fienberg, 2006;Gardner, 2002). A classic example of applying BA in order to make inductive reasoning from an effect to a cause is during 1855 to 1865 in London, England, where John Snow had used BA as his inductive reasoning to scientifically convince audiences that a source of cholera transmission was from a private water supplier company (Koch and Denike, 2006).…”
Section: A Bayesian Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But Simon was right. Absent a kind of Bayesian analysis, and the statistics available were insufficient to provide conclusive proof; 21 and without the identification of and a means of testing for what we now know is the bacterial agent, the quality of the water could not be adequately ascertained.…”
Section: The South London Epidemicmentioning
confidence: 99%