2007
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199209125.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Imprisonment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cannot be an outcome that sits well with proponents of disenfranchisement" [12]. For example, the person could not be legitimately denied the right to send letters expressing her political views to Congress or the local newspaper.…”
Section: Democratic Self-determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cannot be an outcome that sits well with proponents of disenfranchisement" [12]. For example, the person could not be legitimately denied the right to send letters expressing her political views to Congress or the local newspaper.…”
Section: Democratic Self-determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advocates of expressive accounts of punishment often claim that their views provide reasons for reducing the severity of penal sanctions. (See, for example, Duff 2001;Lippke 2007). Their views typically differ from mine in a crucial respect.…”
Section: Bill Wringementioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have in mind here in particular restrictions on prisoners' freedom to associate and to undertake paid work. Someone might suggest that any form of imprisonment worthy of the name must incorporate these features; but work by Richard Lippke (among others) suggests that we should regard these as merely contingent-and undesirable-features of imprisonment (Lippke 2007). (We might also note that to the extent that these cease to be features of imprisonment, the case for thinking that expressive constraints on imprisonment rule out long-term imprisonment will be weakened.)…”
Section: Expressive Limits On Punishment (2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richard Lippke focuses on what he calls ''the reasonably just society.'' 20 In a reasonably just society, a citizen must be in possession of the requisite moral and rational capacities to make reasonably informed decisions regarding their actions. Additionally, and importantly, there must be plausible options available to any citizen for the continuation of a sufficiently good or flourishing life.…”
Section: Nicholas Munnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unfortunately common in existing societies for criminal justice systems to be unfairly or unevenly enforced, thereby biasing the system against particular identifiable groups within each society. 26 This is discussed by Richard Lippke, who claims that ''[a]s anyone who studies the criminal justice system knows, those who wind up on the receiving end of legal punishment do so, in part, because of a complex series of decisions made by officials charged with the enforcement of the criminal law.'' 27 There are many areas where this bias can infiltrate the system.…”
Section: Unequal Enforcement Of Criminal Provisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%