2021
DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Home-based Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy for Persons Who Inject Drugs: An Opportunity for Change in the Time of COVID-19

Abstract: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) refers to the monitored provision of intravenous antibiotics for complicated infections outside of a hospital setting, typically in a rehabilitation facility, an infusion center, or the home. Home-based OPAT allows for safe completion of prolonged courses of therapy while decreasing costs to the healthcare system, minimizing the risk of hospital-related infectious exposures for patients, and permitting patients to recover in a familiar environment. Amidst the COV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondents also noted that rehabilitation, nursing facility, and home nursing institutional policies are also likely to be barriers. Post-acute facilities do frequently reject patients with active or even historical drug use [ 8 ]; recently there have been attempts to file lawsuits against rehabilitation facilities for violating the Americans With Disabilities Act and discriminating against patients on MOUD [ 9 ], though the practice persists. Without specific training on this subject for residents, beliefs about barriers are likely culturally transmitted either attending to resident or resident to resident within institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Respondents also noted that rehabilitation, nursing facility, and home nursing institutional policies are also likely to be barriers. Post-acute facilities do frequently reject patients with active or even historical drug use [ 8 ]; recently there have been attempts to file lawsuits against rehabilitation facilities for violating the Americans With Disabilities Act and discriminating against patients on MOUD [ 9 ], though the practice persists. Without specific training on this subject for residents, beliefs about barriers are likely culturally transmitted either attending to resident or resident to resident within institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providers may be concerned that PICC use may be complicated by secondary line infection, or have opposition to outpatient vascular access as a potential facilitator of further drug use [ 4–6 ]. These concerns are not limited to prescribers; skilled rehabilitation and nursing facilities, infusion companies, and visiting home nurse companies frequently decline service to people with active or even historical substance use disorders [ 7 , 8 ], a discriminatory action that has been challenged as in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act in recent legal settlements [ 9 ]. The existence of these barriers, even if not uniformly applied, can have a strong influence on care plans for patients with SIRI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some people requiring OPAT may be discharged to a facility because they are unjustly and illegally excluded from home OPAT due to their substance use. 19 Given the frequency that people with OUD and serious infections are treated in post-acute care facilities, approaches to improve OPAT completion are critical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing movement for OPAT programs to support PWID will enhance patient access to SOC IV antibiotic treatment, and represents an important advancement in infectious diseases care for PWID [27][28][29]. However, it is likely that even at institutions with expanded access to OPAT, not all PWID may be eligible, either due to physician perceived barriers, lack of safe and stable housing, lack of health insurance, or limited access to outpatient follow-up [30,31]. For some patients there may also be benefits to avoiding the complexities of OPAT.…”
Section: Subgroup Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%