1995
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.4.7551363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking exercise testing in children: a challenge.

D M Cooper
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one should recognise that maximal incremental testing is not representative of the daily pattern of exercise activities in the paediatric group (which is better characterised by short bursts of activity); new submaximal protocols have been suggested to be more suitable for evaluating training responses in children [29]. In addition, the degree of fitness in the initial evaluation was above that expected for asthmatic children (Table 1) and the low pre-intervention prevalence of unfit children could have induced a type II error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one should recognise that maximal incremental testing is not representative of the daily pattern of exercise activities in the paediatric group (which is better characterised by short bursts of activity); new submaximal protocols have been suggested to be more suitable for evaluating training responses in children [29]. In addition, the degree of fitness in the initial evaluation was above that expected for asthmatic children (Table 1) and the low pre-intervention prevalence of unfit children could have induced a type II error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, the level of conditioning was regarded as a major factor for matching subjects, thus avoiding a frequent bias in comparison of asthmatics and healthy individuals. Lastly, the assessment of exercise tolerance and fitness was accomplished through an overall analysis of maximal indices of aerobic performance as well as the trends of the same parameters at different submaximal levels of exercise, as recently recommended when dealing with children [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly notable finding was the relative inefficacy of the training programme in improving the maximal aerobic parameters in almost 60% of the children. However, one should recognise that maximal incremental testing is not representative of the daily pattern of exercise activities in the paediatric group (which is better characterised by short bursts of activity); new submaximal protocols have been suggested to be more suitable for evaluating training responses in children (Cooper, 1995). In addition, the degree of fitness in the initial evaluation was above that expected for asthmatic children and the low pre-intervention prevalence of unfit children could have induced a type II error.…”
Section: Aerobic Training Programmementioning
confidence: 99%