Rethinking Emotion 2014
DOI: 10.1515/9783110259254.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Emotion: Moving beyond Interiority

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cultural models of emotion influence people's perceptions of their feelings; in this case, the notion of interiority draws attention toward internal physiological cues, which in turn reinforce the experience of emotions as stemming from inside the individual. However, anthropologists and philosophers have demonstrated the cultural and historical specificity of this experience of interiority, which is neither shared across all cultural and social groups, nor consistent across time even in “western” contexts (Campe & Weber, 2014; Rosaldo, 1984). Instead, emotions are often understood and experienced to come from outside of individuals or exist in the space between them (Lutz & White, 1986).…”
Section: Metaphors and Mind–body Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural models of emotion influence people's perceptions of their feelings; in this case, the notion of interiority draws attention toward internal physiological cues, which in turn reinforce the experience of emotions as stemming from inside the individual. However, anthropologists and philosophers have demonstrated the cultural and historical specificity of this experience of interiority, which is neither shared across all cultural and social groups, nor consistent across time even in “western” contexts (Campe & Weber, 2014; Rosaldo, 1984). Instead, emotions are often understood and experienced to come from outside of individuals or exist in the space between them (Lutz & White, 1986).…”
Section: Metaphors and Mind–body Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within sociology, emotion is trapped between opposing ends of numerous culturally rendered dichotomies: natural or cultural (Erickson & Cottingham, ; Harkness & Hitlin, ; Leavitt, ; Scheff, ; B. Turner, ; J. H. Turner, ), subjective or objective (Arweck, ; Campe & Weber, ; Furedi, ; Pilkington, ), rational/logical/reasonable or irrational/illogical/unreasonable , also known as emotion vs . cognition (Ariffin, Coicaud, & Popovski, ; Barbalet, ; Berezin, ; Burkart & Weggen, ; Davis, ; Iagulli, ; Jasper, ; Kunkel, ; Loseke & Kusenbach, ; Lutz, ), private/individual/internal/inner or public/collective/external/outer (Ariffin et al, ; Berezin, ; Harkin, ; Lively, ; Pilkington, ; Stets, ), mind or body (Chandler, ; Ross, ; Shilling, ; Smith‐Lovin & Thoits, ; Wettergren, ), ideational/discursive or materialist (Knopp, ; Lyon, ; Ross, ), micro or macro (Bericat, ; Berezin, ; Jasper, ; Stets, ), structure or culture/agency (Bericat, ; Fox, ; Jasper, ; Lively & Weed, ), and expressive or experiential (Ariffin et al, ; Illouz, Gilon, & Shachak, ; Lively, ; Rogers & Robinson, ). And the list goes on.…”
Section: The Dichotomiesmentioning
confidence: 99%