2013
DOI: 10.18278/il.2.2.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Distance in an Era of Online Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the broad curriculum framework outlined above, institutions in Kenya and in Africa more widely, are subject to the same demands as in other parts of the world for programmes that are more flexibly designed for increasingly diverse learning needs and contexts in which open, distance and e-learning (ODeL) approaches need to be employed (Altbach, Reisberg & Rumbley, 2009;Blumenstyk, 2015;Evans & Pauling, 2010;Glennie & Mays, 2013). It was suggested to ANU, building on Educause (2010), Glennie and Mays (2009) and Lapovsky (u.d.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Research On Curriculum Transformation In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the broad curriculum framework outlined above, institutions in Kenya and in Africa more widely, are subject to the same demands as in other parts of the world for programmes that are more flexibly designed for increasingly diverse learning needs and contexts in which open, distance and e-learning (ODeL) approaches need to be employed (Altbach, Reisberg & Rumbley, 2009;Blumenstyk, 2015;Evans & Pauling, 2010;Glennie & Mays, 2013). It was suggested to ANU, building on Educause (2010), Glennie and Mays (2009) and Lapovsky (u.d.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Research On Curriculum Transformation In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2014, the Department of Higher Education and Training gazetted South Africa's first national distance education policy (DHET 2014) and in the same year, the Council on Higher Education published a good practice guide for distance education in a digital era (CHE 2014). These two documents reflect a growing integration of digital technologies in the provision of higher education that has begun to result in a blurring of boundaries between different modes of provision that could potentially obscure some of the quality issues peculiar to distance education provision (Glennie and Mays 2013). While it seems clear that technology has the potential to overcome some of the weaknesses of older models of distance education provision, particularly the limited opportunity for interaction in the correspondence model, it seems equally clear that opting to use technology to create more interactive and open-ended learning experiences requires conscious choices in the design phase that institutions will not necessarily make (Bates and Sangrá 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%