2006
DOI: 10.1086/505375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Bazin: Ontology and Realist Aesthetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…"Statement on Sound" in Eisenstein (1998). 16 See, for example, Andrew (2011) and Morgan (2006). 13 See Thomas Y. Levin's "Introduction" in Kracauer (1995), Miriam Hansen's "Introduction" in Kracauer (1997), and Hansen (2012).…”
Section: Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Statement on Sound" in Eisenstein (1998). 16 See, for example, Andrew (2011) and Morgan (2006). 13 See Thomas Y. Levin's "Introduction" in Kracauer (1995), Miriam Hansen's "Introduction" in Kracauer (1997), and Hansen (2012).…”
Section: Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each image [is] just a fragment of reality existing before any meanings. (1971: 37) As an ontological matter, "Every image is to be seen as an object and every object as an image" (Bazin 1967a: 15-16; but see the subtle reinterpretation of Morgan 2006). Likewise, sound for Bazin is designed to translate "the physiology of existence" into "the concrete integral" in a way exactly parallel to the image, yet independent (Bazin 1967b: 131, 133, 139).…”
Section: Nonidentity (Of Copy/original) Versus Identity Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These "entailments" are of utmost necessity to the filmmakers' ends in The Unquiet Grave. 23 First, in order to function as proof and to serve the function of revenge, the photograph, although it is not the same thing as the corpse, must indisputably refer to a reality "behind" it. Second, the photograph must function as evidence of a past moment, because in the present it is not possible to see these mutilations, first of all because the corpse is buried, and second of all because the mutilations were later cosmetically repaired and do not appear in subsequent, widely circulated photographs.…”
Section: Lens As Witness and Light As Testimony: Indexicality In Thementioning
confidence: 99%