2020
DOI: 10.1080/03017605.2020.1850640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking base and superstructure, yet again

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, G.A. Cohen's extensive writing on the section and Dileep Edara's "restrictive" account challenge the conventional perspective (Cohen 2000;Edara 2016; see also Ervin 2020). As Edara characterizes it, Marx is not presenting an "all-encompassing paradigm that explains away all the social spheres in reference to the economy," but "a conceptual model to explicate the inextricable connection between the production relations (the base) and politics and law (superstructure)" (Edara 2016, 16).…”
Section: Social Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, G.A. Cohen's extensive writing on the section and Dileep Edara's "restrictive" account challenge the conventional perspective (Cohen 2000;Edara 2016; see also Ervin 2020). As Edara characterizes it, Marx is not presenting an "all-encompassing paradigm that explains away all the social spheres in reference to the economy," but "a conceptual model to explicate the inextricable connection between the production relations (the base) and politics and law (superstructure)" (Edara 2016, 16).…”
Section: Social Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reiterate the point, this means that the superstructure is equivalent to institutions, not mental categories or ideas. In more modern parlance, we might interpret the superstructure as representing two key spheres of society, the public sphere and the civic sphere (also known as the non-profit or third sector), areas comprised of institutions such as courthouses, government offices, universities, and NGOs (Ervin 2020).…”
Section: Social Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ervin (2020) mengamini tafsir Cohen yang mendefinisikan suprastruktur Marx sebagai "legal, political, religious, and other non-economic institutions". Tidak hanya itu, suprastruktur menjadi kelompok institusi yang terdiri dari sektor publik dan masyarakat sipil; kelompok tersebut termasuk organisasi yang membentuk negara, seperti sistem hukum, militer, dan lembaga pendidikan publik, serta berbagai lembaga non-ekonomi termasuk kelompok agama, LSM, organisasi masyarakat, dan universitas (Ervin, 2020).…”
Section: Manusia Berkelindan Diantara Basis Dan Suprastruktur: Surplu...unclassified
“…There are many ways of theorizing the relationship between the base and superstructure relevant to the issues raised in this article (Ervin, 2020). While Marx saw base and superstructure as an evolving process constantly in motion, we can at any one point in time consider their present states.…”
Section: Welfare States and Environmental Policymentioning
confidence: 99%