Rethinking assessment in a digital age: opportunities, challenges and risks

Abstract

General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. AbstractWhilst it is frequently argued that assessment sits at the heart of the learning process, in practice assessment often remains narrowly focused on qualifications and reporting achievements, driven by institutional and societal aspirations and tensions such as accountability and economic well being. Yet, the need for assessment to account for the knowledge, skills, dispositions and attitudes necessary to equip young people for a changing and increasingly digital world is also increasingly acknowledged. Based on our recent research review, this article critically examines the role of technology enhanced assessment (or TEA). We argue that whilst technology offers many potentially creative opportunities for innovation and for rethinking assessment purposes, there are also numerous risks and challenges. In particular we highlight ethical concerns over social exclusion and new forms of digital dividedness and the increasing risks associated with big data and the rise of learning analytics. Finally, we note that much research and innovation happens in silos, where policy, research and practice on assessment, technology enhanced assessment and ethical and political concerns are not linked up. We conclude that there needs to be a much more wide-ranging, critical and nuanced discussion in educational and policy circles so that debates about the potential of technology can be linked to improving assessment in the light of the range of social and political challenges that such progress presents. We end with some critical questions for policy, practice and research communities which we offer as a starting point for future thinking and ways forward.Keywords: formative/summative, e-assessment, collaboration, learning analytics, ethics, inclusion, digital literacies. 2 Rethinking Assessment in a Digital Age: opportunities, challenges and risks AbstractWhilst it is frequently argued that assessment sits at the heart of the learning process, in practice assessment often remains narrowly focused on qualifications and reporting achievements, driven by institutional and societal aspirations and tensions such as accountability and economic well being. Yet, the need for assessment to account for the knowledge, skills, dispositions and attitudes necessary to equip young people for a changing and increasingly digital world is also increasingly acknowledged. Based on our recent research review, this article critically examines the role of technology enhanced assessment (or TEA). We argue that whilst technology offers many potentially creative opportunities for innovation and for rethinking assessment purposes, there are also numerous risks and challenges. In particular we highlight ethical concerns over social exclusion and new forms of digital dividedness and the increasing risks associated with big data and the rise of learning analytics. Finally, we note that much research and ...

Closure of Universities Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on Education and Mental Health of Students and Academic Staff

“…The transition from face-toface teaching to online delivery has a serious impact on assessments and evaluation. Although technology has been used earlier to support teaching and learning, the assessment aspect is often under-developed [20]. Applying assessments online on those courses designed for face-to-face learning is a challenging task.…”

Review of computer‐based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education

“…Advances in technology and the increasing application of technology‐rich environments in educational settings have provoked discussions of assessment in the digital age (McFarlane, ) and technology‐enhanced assessment (i.e. use of technologies to enhance formal or informal assessment; Timmis et al, ). Previously, measuring complex skills was difficult given the lack of clear and established definitions, theoretical multidimensionality of the constructs and subjectivity with regard to scoring (Shute & Wang, ).…”

“…To justify the need for such a paper, we first examined nine recent and relevant literature reviews. The reviews covered topics related to (a) assessment for learning in the classroom (Bennett, ; Birenbaum et al, ; Heitink, van der Kleij, Veldkamp, Schildkamp & Kippers, ), (b) summative and formative assessment in the digital age (Oldfield, Broadfoot, Sutherland & Timmis, ; Timmis, Broadfoot, Sutherland & Oldfield, ), (c) effectiveness of feedback in computer‐based assessment environments (van der Kleij, Feskens & Eggen, ; van der Kleij, Timmers & Eggen, ) and (d) psychometric analysis of the performance data of simulation‐based assessments (de Klerk, Veldkamp & Eggen, ).…”

Time to tame the leviathan? Perspectives and possibilities for a new era in assessment

“…A moment's thought suggests that the potential for an even more pervasive assessment environment than that which exists at present is as dangerous as it is powerful. As Timmis, Broadfoot, Sutherland and Oldfield (2016) argue, although TEA presents unprecedented opportunities for enhancing how assessments are conducted and used, it also carries clear ethical and social risks. The starting point of the focal paper is that assessment plays a central role in education and has a huge impact on teaching and learning.…”