Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2019) 2019
DOI: 10.2991/iccessh-19.2019.294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Approaches to Idioms and Idiomaticity

Abstract: In early generative approaches, idiomaticity was equated with non-compositionality, and it was regarded as a binary concept, dividing language into idioms and non-idioms. Idioms were assigned only a marginal status in language. This paper summarizes findings from studies in discourse analysis, phraseology, and psycholinguistics that have shown that idiomaticity is better conceived of as a phenomenon that is multifactorial in nature, scalar in nature, and deserves a central position in any grammatical theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students need to consider it as part of wider concept of idiomaticity (Kurniasih, 2011). Furthermore, there are categories describe idiomaticity (Ding, 2019;Hsu, 2019): 1) Pure idioms: they are almost fixed and cannot be interpreted literally; 2) we cannot guess the meaning of the whole expression by getting the meaning of individual word. For example: beat around the bush; 3) Figurative idioms: they are fairly fixed such as catch fire and tread water; 4) Restricted collocations: they have one element used non-literally and the others literally such as jog someone's memory; 5) Open collocations: they have free combined elements with each having literal meaning.…”
Section: Nature Of Collocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students need to consider it as part of wider concept of idiomaticity (Kurniasih, 2011). Furthermore, there are categories describe idiomaticity (Ding, 2019;Hsu, 2019): 1) Pure idioms: they are almost fixed and cannot be interpreted literally; 2) we cannot guess the meaning of the whole expression by getting the meaning of individual word. For example: beat around the bush; 3) Figurative idioms: they are fairly fixed such as catch fire and tread water; 4) Restricted collocations: they have one element used non-literally and the others literally such as jog someone's memory; 5) Open collocations: they have free combined elements with each having literal meaning.…”
Section: Nature Of Collocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Idioms can describe several expressions, ranging from joy to depression, words of love to hate, and even the soul of a hero who becomes cowardly (Ding, 2019;Dixson, 1983). In addition, idioms can be used to express time, place, or measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%