2016
DOI: 10.24839/b21.3.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking and Updating Demographic Questions: Guidance to Improve Descriptions of Research Samples

Abstract: is the International Honor So ci ety in Psychology, found ed in 1929. Its mission: "recognizing and promoting excellence in the science and application of psy chol ogy." (Note. Our new mission statement is available at http://www.psichi.org/?page=purpose) Mem ber ship is open to undergraduates, graduate students, faculty, and alumni mak ing the study of psy chol ogy one of their major interests and who meet Psi Chi's min i mum qual i fi ca tions. Psi Chi is a member of the As so cia tion of Col lege Honor So c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that limited data are available on the potential MH impact of COVID-19 on children, adolescents, and caregivers, we intentionally kept the inclusion criteria related to child and adolescent age broad, with the goal of examining differences and similarities across age subgroups. Caregivers were racially and ethnically diverse (2% American Indian; 15% Asian; 7% Black or African-American; 72% White; 8% multiracial; 12% Hispanic or Latino), reported a range of household incomes (14% poor; 35% working class; 50% middle class; 2% affluent) [ 22 ], and were between the ages of 18 and 60 years old ( M = 35.80; SD = 8.81). Caregivers largely identified as female (81%; 18% male; 2% transgender or gender non-conforming), which aligns with broader trends in family-based research [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that limited data are available on the potential MH impact of COVID-19 on children, adolescents, and caregivers, we intentionally kept the inclusion criteria related to child and adolescent age broad, with the goal of examining differences and similarities across age subgroups. Caregivers were racially and ethnically diverse (2% American Indian; 15% Asian; 7% Black or African-American; 72% White; 8% multiracial; 12% Hispanic or Latino), reported a range of household incomes (14% poor; 35% working class; 50% middle class; 2% affluent) [ 22 ], and were between the ages of 18 and 60 years old ( M = 35.80; SD = 8.81). Caregivers largely identified as female (81%; 18% male; 2% transgender or gender non-conforming), which aligns with broader trends in family-based research [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of analysis, the categorical item, VHA years of practice, was divided into 2 segments of nearly equal size: 10 years or less and 11 years or more. Prefer not to answer responses were excluded from analysis, as this option lacked specificity recommended for demographics questions [42]. Rurality geocoding developed by VHA's Office of Rural Health to estimate the percentage rurality of the catchment area was applied to respondents' primary medical center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal consistency reliabilities ranged from .73 to .80, and correlations between long and short form range from .83 to .92 in a community sample (Ashton & Lee, 2009). A six-item sociodemographic questionnaire was adopted from Hughes et al (2016).…”
Section: Instrumentation and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…average, how many hours do you work a week, including time at a hospital, in the field, or on call? a) Below 48 hours b) Between 48-53 hours c) 58-63 hours d) More than 63 hoursSource:(Hughes et al, 2016) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%