2012
DOI: 10.1159/000353477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retethering in Children after Sectioning of the Filum Terminale

Abstract: Background/Aim: Sectioning of the filum terminale is performed when spinal cord tethering is suspected, sometimes without clinical symptoms. Retethering can occur and require reoperation due to the presentation of either recurrent or new symptoms. The purpose of this institutional review was to identify the retethering rate in children, especially in those who were initially asymptomatic, and to discuss the role of surgery. Methods: The medical records of all children at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Onta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All TSC, regardless of whether they have undergone SCU, are at risk for clinical decline. SCU does not eliminate the possibility that deterioration may occur later, even for the simplest form of TSC (fatty filum) …”
Section: Clinical Follow‐up With or Without Tethered Cord Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All TSC, regardless of whether they have undergone SCU, are at risk for clinical decline. SCU does not eliminate the possibility that deterioration may occur later, even for the simplest form of TSC (fatty filum) …”
Section: Clinical Follow‐up With or Without Tethered Cord Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,10,15 Despite generally successful initial procedures, retethering is a very difficult to manage postoperative complication. Surgical series have shown retethering rates approaching 45% in more complex cases of myelomeningocele and lipomyelomeningocele; in cases of thick/fatty filum terminale sectioning, considerably lower rates have been reported, and scattered reports in the literature cite a retethering rate of about 8%-9% on long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7,16 Most retethering is attributed to scar and arachnoid adherence around the neural elements attached to the spinal meninges, developing traction and nerve root dysfunction over time. 15 Maintenance of a pristine subarachnoid space during surgery and robust irrigation prior to dural closure have been espoused as technical nuances thought to minimize the risk of intradural adhesion. Expansile duraplasty has also been advocated to create more subarachnoid space, although it does introduce 2 new sites of potential adhesion at the suture line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Implications for treatment however have not yet been derived from the findings as published to date with the exception of spinal manipulation described by Tomaschewski 10 or neurosurgical release of the filum terminale as described by Royo-Salvador 12 . Retethering after sectioning of the filum terminale has been described 13 . Following the rationale of Tomaschewski 10 , external manipulation might influence IFF, the 'flatback' contracture as found in the lower thoracic area in patients with beginning AIS and have a beneficial effect on the 3D deformity of the spine and trunk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%