1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02172722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retests in static perimetry

Abstract: A large pool of visual field data measured with the JO program on the Octopus automated perimeter was used to compare the outcomes of simulated selective retests to those of global retests. Compared to global retesting, with selective retesting an increase in the mean sensitivity and a decrease in the number of pathological test locations were found on the average. We conclude that global retests should be preferred to selective ones so that the perimetric results are not falsified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If, however, the indices are border line, the examination can be continued with phase 2 in order to obtain more accurate results. Phase 2 is a re-test [5] of all the test locations, allowing more precise calcula tion of MD and MS, in addition to determination of cor rected LV (CLV) and the short-term fluctuation. This, in turn, allows a separation of real scotomas from deviations due to scatter.…”
Section: The Concept Of the Octopus Program M1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, however, the indices are border line, the examination can be continued with phase 2 in order to obtain more accurate results. Phase 2 is a re-test [5] of all the test locations, allowing more precise calcula tion of MD and MS, in addition to determination of cor rected LV (CLV) and the short-term fluctuation. This, in turn, allows a separation of real scotomas from deviations due to scatter.…”
Section: The Concept Of the Octopus Program M1mentioning
confidence: 99%