2017
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1312462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retesting the limits of data-driven learning: feedback and error correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sharing composition and commenting on writing with peers and instructors through platforms like online forums, wikis, social network sites, and blogs allow students to engage in computer-assisted writing strategies related to planning, organizing, composing, sharing, and reflecting (Miyazoe & Anderson, 2010). Furthermore, online writing tools give L2 writers new strategies to improve composition through data-driven learning (Crosthwaite, 2017), automated writing evaluation (Stevenson & Phakiti, 2014), and online translation websites (Goves & Mundt, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharing composition and commenting on writing with peers and instructors through platforms like online forums, wikis, social network sites, and blogs allow students to engage in computer-assisted writing strategies related to planning, organizing, composing, sharing, and reflecting (Miyazoe & Anderson, 2010). Furthermore, online writing tools give L2 writers new strategies to improve composition through data-driven learning (Crosthwaite, 2017), automated writing evaluation (Stevenson & Phakiti, 2014), and online translation websites (Goves & Mundt, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also noted that corpus consultation was more effective in correcting errors concerning synonyms. Similarly, Dolgova and Mueller (2019) found that local lexico-grammatical and register errors were more receptive to the approach; Crosthwaite (2017) found that errors of word choice, word form, collocations and phrasing were more readily corrected than errors of deletion or morphosyntax. Charles (2018) found a relevance between certain corpus functions and language problems rectified, and noted that N-grams, Word List and Keyword List functions of lexical analysis tools allowed the users to identify and revise unknown language problems.…”
Section: Written Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Table 1 shows that DDL activities have been proved generally effective for the teaching and learning of EFL writing with respect to a variety of language aspects. Chambers, 2006;Charles, 2018;Crosthwaite, 2017;Dolgova & Mueller, 2019;Gaskell & Cobb, 2004;Gilmore, 2009;Kennedy & Miceli, 2001;Luo & Liao, 2015;Mueller & Jacobsen, 2015;Sun, 2003;Todd, 2001;Tono et al, 2014;Yoon & Jo, 2014…”
Section: Effectivess Of Ddlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies suggest that corpus exploration enhances the students' knowledge of collocational behaviour (Li, 2017;Vyatkina, 2016) and that it supports language awareness processes (Boulton & Landure, 2016;Schaeffer-Lacroix, 2016). Although none of the studies analysed by Crosthwaite (2017) provides evidence for a better mastery of morpho-syntactical features thanks to corpus exploration within the context of English for academic purposes, a study conducted with English-speaking learners of German L2 showed that data-driven learning improves the morpho-syntactic knowledge of learners (Vyatkina, 2016). This issue demands further research.…”
Section: Corpora For Foreign Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%