2014
DOI: 10.1097/nur.0000000000000020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention Strategies in Longitudinal Studies With Emerging Adults

Abstract: Purpose/Objectives The purpose of this report is to describe retention strategies that were useful and those that were not in a longitudinal study of emerging adults. Background of Project A longitudinal study examining the transition to young adulthood among emerging adults with type 1 diabetes, which had success in retention, provided the context for describing retention strategies. Rationale A challenge in longitudinally designed studies is retention of participants since their loss decreases power for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were recruited for a study about first-year experiences (see Study 2 of Whillans, Christie, Cheung, Jordan, & Chen, 2017, for details); all participants who completed the first wave of data collection and who agreed to be recontacted in the future (N = 289) were invited to take part in the follow-up 2-3 years later. Consistent with prior literature (Hanna, Scott, & Schmidt, 2014), retention after such an extended period was a challenge; however, the final sample used in this manuscript consisted of 67 students in their third (38.8%) or fourth (61.2%) undergraduate year (see Table 1 for descriptives of the sample). Importantly, participants who returned for the follow-up did not differ significantly from participants who did not return, with respect to psychosocial and sociodemographic variables (T1 and T2; see online supplement 1 Table S3 for descriptive and inferential statistics).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Participants were recruited for a study about first-year experiences (see Study 2 of Whillans, Christie, Cheung, Jordan, & Chen, 2017, for details); all participants who completed the first wave of data collection and who agreed to be recontacted in the future (N = 289) were invited to take part in the follow-up 2-3 years later. Consistent with prior literature (Hanna, Scott, & Schmidt, 2014), retention after such an extended period was a challenge; however, the final sample used in this manuscript consisted of 67 students in their third (38.8%) or fourth (61.2%) undergraduate year (see Table 1 for descriptives of the sample). Importantly, participants who returned for the follow-up did not differ significantly from participants who did not return, with respect to psychosocial and sociodemographic variables (T1 and T2; see online supplement 1 Table S3 for descriptive and inferential statistics).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, providing convenient locations and incentives to encourage participation, regularly monitoring the progress of field workers and maintaining good relationships with respondents were other strategies to maintain communication with respondents. 20 In the present study, however, some of the methods implemented in the previous, study such as communicating through email, was not practical because most of the respondents did not have email addresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For example, using comprehensive contact logs, including a current address, telephone numbers (home and/or cellphone) and e‐mail address of each participant, as well as the address and telephone numbers of the next of kin or friends to assist in tracking respondents’ whereabouts. In addition, providing convenient locations and incentives to encourage participation, regularly monitoring the progress of field workers and maintaining good relationships with respondents were other strategies to maintain communication with respondents . In the present study, however, some of the methods implemented in the previous, study such as communicating through email, was not practical because most of the respondents did not have email addresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations