2014
DOI: 10.1676/13-098.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention rates of glue-attached radio-transmitters on two small bird species with contrasting life histories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(), because, using this method, reasonable retention times (≥ 25 d) have been reported for another aerial insectivore (Chimney Swifts, Chaetura pelagica ; Diemer et al. ) and other attachment methods have more often been reported to negatively affect birds (Barron et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(), because, using this method, reasonable retention times (≥ 25 d) have been reported for another aerial insectivore (Chimney Swifts, Chaetura pelagica ; Diemer et al. ) and other attachment methods have more often been reported to negatively affect birds (Barron et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Before being glued to the clipped feathers, transmitters were first glued to a small piece of black cotton fabric slightly larger than the transmitter to increase the surface area of attachment. We used this "clip and glue" method, similar to that described by Raim (1978) and Johnson et al (1991), because, using this method, reasonable retention times (≥ 25 d) have been reported for another aerial insectivore (Chimney Swifts, Chaetura pelagica; Diemer et al 2014) and other attachment methods have more often been reported to negatively affect birds (Barron et al 2010). All birds were banded with United States Geological Survey aluminum leg bands (issued by the Canadian Wildlife Service) and released at the site of capture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reliable estimation of survival rates in the wild, a key step is the accurate identification of individuals. Classically, individual identification relies on visible markers such as leg bands (Lincoln 1921), patagial tags (Anderson 1963) and remote radio transmitter devices such as short-range VHF or satellite-received transmitters (Varland et al 2007;Diemer et al 2014). These marking techniques have greatly facilitated the estimation of survival, but they can be labor intensive, time consuming and costly, and potentially have deleterious impacts on the behavior, physiology and survival of individuals through catching and handling and from the equipment deployed (Klugman et al 1993;Booms et al 2011;Peniche et al 2011;Dixon et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, drop-off mechanisms and weak links in harnesses have become more widely used [74]. Simple glue-on-feathers has been used for short-term deployments in the past [75], but can damage the feathers or skin of animals. However, if it is desirable that the tag stays on the animal for a long time, the material and attachment methods should be adapted, taking into account habitat conditions and the destructiveness of the animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%