2004
DOI: 10.4314/sajhe.v17i2.25310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention: predicting first-year success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mills, Heyworth and Rosenwax (2009) identified a number of factors associated with first-year students' success; the most influential being an average and above average Grade 12 mark, English as a first language and Accounting as a Grade 12 subject. Lourens and Smit (2003) confirmed that students' aggregate Grade 12 mark and main fields of learning are significant predictors of success in their first year of study at an academic institution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Mills, Heyworth and Rosenwax (2009) identified a number of factors associated with first-year students' success; the most influential being an average and above average Grade 12 mark, English as a first language and Accounting as a Grade 12 subject. Lourens and Smit (2003) confirmed that students' aggregate Grade 12 mark and main fields of learning are significant predictors of success in their first year of study at an academic institution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, the value of matric results as predictor of academic achievement is subject to some debate in the literature. Barnes et al (2009), Eiselen andGeyser (2003), and Lourens and Smit (2003) all find that there is a significant relationship between matric marks and academic success. In one of the most detailed statistical studies of ten higher education institutions by the HERD-SA project group (Lourens et al 2007), matric results were found to correlate significantly with university performance, but a number of other factors were more significant in a regression model to predict success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Admission testing is a highly complex and contested domain, with some institutions using personality inventories and occupational aptitude tests, while others employ biographical questionnaires and/or school grades. Moreover, although school grade 12 performance of disadvantaged students does correlate with tertiary academic performance and cannot therefore be completely disregarded as a predictor of tertiary academic performance (Samkin, 1996;Huysamen and Rabenheimer, 1999;Lourens and Smit, 2003), it is generally accepted that it cannot be used as a sole predictor of academic success at university.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%