2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention performance of green roofs in three different climate regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No statistically significant differences were found for the rainy period. According to results obtained by Viola et al [13] and Fassman-Beck et al [15], climate regime appears to be a relevant determinant for the retention performance of GRs. …”
Section: Effect Of Event Characteristics and Rainfall Regime On Watermentioning
confidence: 88%
“…No statistically significant differences were found for the rainy period. According to results obtained by Viola et al [13] and Fassman-Beck et al [15], climate regime appears to be a relevant determinant for the retention performance of GRs. …”
Section: Effect Of Event Characteristics and Rainfall Regime On Watermentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Retention is expressed as the percentage of rainfall stored in green roof and is calculated by the following formula [41]:…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stovin et al [43] outline the development of a conceptual hydrological flux model for the long-term continuous simulation of runoff and drought risk for green roof systems. Sims et al [44] measured the retention performance of green roofs in three different climate regions: Ontario (humid continental), Calgary (semi-arid, continental), and Nova Scotia (humid maritime). Drier climates were found to have greater cumulative stormwater retention by percentage.…”
Section: Hydrologymentioning
confidence: 99%