2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.12.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention pattern profiling of fungal metabolites on mixed-mode reversed-phase/weak anion exchange stationary phases in comparison to reversed-phase and weak anion exchange separation materials by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionisation-tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in comparison to our recently developed mixed-mode separation materials of RP/weak anion exchange type [13], which can inter alia separate compounds by exploiting simultaneously anion exchange and HILIC [14,15], one can usually not make use of RP and HILIC interactions at the same time. Nevertheless, due to the different phase polarities and interactive sites we expected unique selectivity properties to arise on the investigated separation materials both in the HILIC and RP mode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in comparison to our recently developed mixed-mode separation materials of RP/weak anion exchange type [13], which can inter alia separate compounds by exploiting simultaneously anion exchange and HILIC [14,15], one can usually not make use of RP and HILIC interactions at the same time. Nevertheless, due to the different phase polarities and interactive sites we expected unique selectivity properties to arise on the investigated separation materials both in the HILIC and RP mode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). In contrast, the position of the acidic solutes relative to the neutral compounds in the chromatogram can be easily varied or adjusted by either a change of the total ion-exchange capacity of the stationary phase through alteration of the ligand coverage or by a change of the actual ion-exchange capacity through variations of the ionic strength or the pH of the eluent [22]. With a slight reduction of the anion-exchange capacity of the mixed-mode phase from 0.36 to 0.24 mmol/g the retentivity of the RP/WAX-AQ phase for the acidic constituents in the test mix was diminished, while both the hydrophobic selectivity between the alkylbenzenes and the acid selectivity between hydrophilic DETP and more lipophilic Boc-Pro-Phe were still more or less maintained (cf.…”
Section: Comparison Of Various Mixed-mode Rp/wax Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the mixed-mode phases of Fig. 1 have been proposed recently in various applications [10, 11, 20 -23] such as peptide separations [10], organophosphate metabolism studies [20], ethanol consumption marker analysis in urine [21], and chromatographic profiling with mycotoxins [22]. It is the goal of the present study, to further illustrate the chromatographic characteristics of these mixed-mode RP/weak anion-exchangers (RP/WAX) stationary phases by simple chromatographic tests providing information on their hydrophobic selectivity and ion-exchange capacity using an RP-type elution mode (40% ACN in buffer).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these columns are not only complementary to reversed-phase columns but also provide different selectivities under different conditions. [22][23][24][25] The presence of both reversed-phase and ion-exchange functionalities requires no ion-pairing agent in the mobile phase to separate highly hydrophilic charged analytes, thus simplifying the mobile phase and making the method compatible with MS. 20,21 Previous reports suggest that mixed-mode columns capable of both reversed-phase and ion-exchange separation modes can be of some value for improved separation of polar substances. 26,27 Actually, these columns with gradient mode showed significant improvements in the peak shape of oligonucleotides.…”
Section: Lc-ms/ms Analysis Of L-carnitinementioning
confidence: 99%