2021
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp00341k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention of surface structure causes lower density in atomic layer deposition of amorphous titanium oxide thin films

Abstract: Size effects and structural modifications in amorphous TiO2 films deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) were investigated. As with the previously investigated ALD-deposited Al2O3 system we found that the film’s...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation energies ( U ) for the corresponding processes are derived from the slopes of the linear fits as shown in Figure . Lower activation energies obtained for set-2 (i.e., for TiO 2 layers) compared to set-1 (i.e., for Al 2 O 3 layers) (Figures a,b) further corroborate the higher conductivity of TiO 2 layers compared to Al 2 O 3 layers, possibly due to a higher concentration of charge carriers at the surface/subsurface region of TiO 2 sublayers. This observed conductivity contrast between TiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 sublayers promotes charge accumulation across interfaces and further supports M–W interfacial polarization in the subnanometric regime . Because the calculated activation energies of conduction for both the layers lie in a range from ∼0.11 to 0.21 eV, electron hopping via oxygen vacancies (OVs) can be assigned as the conduction mechanism in ATA NLs. , For TiO 2 layer conduction processes, the decrease in the activation energy from 0.16 to 0.11 eV with t s decreasing from ∼1 to 0.8 nm suggests an increased hopping probability of charge carriers in TiO 2 .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The activation energies ( U ) for the corresponding processes are derived from the slopes of the linear fits as shown in Figure . Lower activation energies obtained for set-2 (i.e., for TiO 2 layers) compared to set-1 (i.e., for Al 2 O 3 layers) (Figures a,b) further corroborate the higher conductivity of TiO 2 layers compared to Al 2 O 3 layers, possibly due to a higher concentration of charge carriers at the surface/subsurface region of TiO 2 sublayers. This observed conductivity contrast between TiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 sublayers promotes charge accumulation across interfaces and further supports M–W interfacial polarization in the subnanometric regime . Because the calculated activation energies of conduction for both the layers lie in a range from ∼0.11 to 0.21 eV, electron hopping via oxygen vacancies (OVs) can be assigned as the conduction mechanism in ATA NLs. , For TiO 2 layer conduction processes, the decrease in the activation energy from 0.16 to 0.11 eV with t s decreasing from ∼1 to 0.8 nm suggests an increased hopping probability of charge carriers in TiO 2 .…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Hence, the linear increase in tan δ toward a low-frequency side is due to long-range electron hopping-driven dc conductivity (σ 0 ) across the NL structure. Additionally, the relaxation peaks (marked by arrows) observed in the tan δ versus f plot (Figure b) are found to shift toward a higher-frequency side with t s decreasing from ∼2 to 0.7 nm, which further indicates a decrease in the relaxation time with a decrease in the sublayer thickness, probably due to an enhanced concentration of surface/interface states. Furthermore, the maximum tan δ (∼0.9) observed for 0.5A-0.5T NL is probably due to enhanced intermixing of TiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 layers, thereby forming a composite layer of AlTiO x or TiAlO x . ,, …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The GO/Ti samples are distinct from the B-type samples for the following main reason: the Ti-rich oxides grown electrochemically (see below) on Ti, including Ti 6 O, are reported to be conductive. [86][87][88] This is veried by observing two orders of magnitude higher currents passing through the Ti/rGO/Ti samples than the analogous B-type samples under the same biasing conditions (the max current level in Fig. 6d should Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%