1982
DOI: 10.1016/0165-6147(82)91235-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention of knowledge of pharmacology by U.S. and Canadian medical students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, these results from Mexico could only be found in a newly-designed pharmacology course; the old, traditional course did not display knowledge gain. Similar results were also found [ 14 ] in a North American study. Other analyses, mainly on basic biomedical knowledge, showed between 2.9% and 35% of knowledge loss after 15 to 21 months [ 15 ], [ 16 ], [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Interestingly, these results from Mexico could only be found in a newly-designed pharmacology course; the old, traditional course did not display knowledge gain. Similar results were also found [ 14 ] in a North American study. Other analyses, mainly on basic biomedical knowledge, showed between 2.9% and 35% of knowledge loss after 15 to 21 months [ 15 ], [ 16 ], [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In both of these studies the retention exams were performed after passing clinical courses, like the present study, but the difference is the shorter RIs in their studies (22 and 24 months in contrast to 30 and 48 months in the present study). Another reason for this result can be the fact that according to the NOP World Culture Score Index (2014) the USA is among the first thirty countries which have the highest per capita reading (Kennedy et al, 1981;Saffran et al, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the fact that the RI covered (parts of) the clinical years, better retention of abnormal processes does not come as a surprise. Similarly, within biochemistry, Saffran et al (1982) found that test items that deal with cellular biochemistry suffered a greater loss in retention than did the items that deal with tissue, organ and whole body biochemistry. The biggest drop in performance occurred for an item dealing with the role of lipoic acid in intermediary metabolism, a topic that is unrelated to any major clinical situation .…”
Section: Long-term Retention Of Basic Science Knowledge Learned In Mementioning
confidence: 96%