1992
DOI: 10.3354/meps081025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention efficiency of sub-micrometer particles by the pharyngeal filter of the pelagic tunicate Oikopleura vanhoeffeni

Abstract: Retention efficiencles of 0.6 to 7 l m diameter particles were determined for the pelagic tunicate Oikopleura vanhoeffenj by offering individuals a graded series of latex microspherrs and measuring the change in volume proportion directly by microscope counts of the number of beads of each size in suspension vs in the gut. Beads the size of free-liv~ng bacteria (0.6 pm) were retained with a mean efficiency of 44 t 8 % ( ? 95 % CI), whereas 1, 3 and 7 Gm beads were retained with mean efficiencies of 58 5 8 "h, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also absent are the impacts of relatively rare large salps. Pelagic tunicates generally have higher specific rates of water clearance and they feed closer to the base of the food web than copepods (e.g., Alldredge 1981;Diebel and Lee 1992;Madin et al 1997). Consequently, their impacts would need to be considered to arrive at a full accounting of mesozooplankton grazing at the study site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also absent are the impacts of relatively rare large salps. Pelagic tunicates generally have higher specific rates of water clearance and they feed closer to the base of the food web than copepods (e.g., Alldredge 1981;Diebel and Lee 1992;Madin et al 1997). Consequently, their impacts would need to be considered to arrive at a full accounting of mesozooplankton grazing at the study site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among copepods, the genera more abundant in the MS are known to exploit a large variety of food resources, including fecal pellets (e.g., Oithona, González and Smetacek, 1994;Svensen and Nejstgaard, 2003) and marine snow (e.g., oncaeids, Alldredge, 1976;Ohtsuka et al, 1993). Appendicularians, which are capable to feeding on pico-and small nanoplankton (Deibel and Lee, 1992), constitute a bypass from the lower trophic levels to fishes (Deibel and Lee, 1992), contributing to a more efficient food web like the one described in the oligotrophic North Aegean Sea (SiokouFrangou et al, 2002).…”
Section: Planktonic Food Webs In the Mediterranean Epipelagosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, appendicularian houses together with their faecal pellets may constitute an important component of marine snow (Alldredge & Gotschalk 1990, Hansen et al 1996. Furthermore, due to the high efficiency with which appendicularians ingest nanoplankton and picoplankton (King et al 1980, Deibel 1988, Deibel & Lee 1992, Acuña et al 1996, they constitute a pathway through which small cells that otherwise do not sink may be transported out of the euphotic zone. Consequently, when appendicularians are abundant, small phytoplankton cells may contribute much more to the vertical flux than when the community is dominated by copepods (Urban et al 1992, Hansen et al 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%