1983
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/148.1.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention and Extraction of Third Molars in Naval Personnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we found that mesioangular impaction of the mandibular third molar was the most common (44.8%) followed by distoangular impaction (22.6). With regard to frequency of mesioangular impaction, our result was similar to that reported by Quek et al 10 ,Schroeder et al 11 and Stanley et al 12 . Distoangular impaction was the second most common type of impaction and we found no similar result in any study.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, we found that mesioangular impaction of the mandibular third molar was the most common (44.8%) followed by distoangular impaction (22.6). With regard to frequency of mesioangular impaction, our result was similar to that reported by Quek et al 10 ,Schroeder et al 11 and Stanley et al 12 . Distoangular impaction was the second most common type of impaction and we found no similar result in any study.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Schroeder et al 11 , Stanley et al 12 showed that mesioangular impactions were the most common, followed by horizontal and vertical impactions. Others like Sasano et al 13 , Venta et al 6 found vertical impactions to be the most common variant which was followed by horizontal impactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%