2011
DOI: 10.1021/ma200831f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retardation in RAFT Polymerization: Does Cross-Termination Occur with Short Radicals Only?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
41
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The chain‐length‐dependence of fragmentation rate constant16 and of intermediate termination rate constant17, 18 has been proposed. In our experiments, BDB was used in the bulk polymerization, while polystyryl dithiobenzoate was used in the miniemulsion polymerization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The chain‐length‐dependence of fragmentation rate constant16 and of intermediate termination rate constant17, 18 has been proposed. In our experiments, BDB was used in the bulk polymerization, while polystyryl dithiobenzoate was used in the miniemulsion polymerization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…These involve the occurrence of (a) a missing step termination or (b) short chain termination. [128] Ting et al [129] have attempted to answer the question of whether crosstermination (between 4 and P n ) might involve short radicals only. They [129] compared the rates of polymerization when a macro-azo-initiator (5) and a polystyrene macro-RAFT agent (6) were used in a RAFT polymerization of styrene (St) (this system should involve no short chain radicals) to the situation where cumyl dithiobenzoate (11) was the RAFT agent and azoisobutyronitrile (AIBN) was used as initiator.…”
Section: Mechanisms For Retardationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was observed at the beginning of polymerization that was followed by pseudo-first order kinetics. This kind of behavior had already been observed in the CDB-mediated polymerization of methacrylates [214] and its origin is the subject of a lively debate [215][216][217][218]. Fairly uniform polymers (Đ  1.20) with M n up to 14,000 Da were obtained that were chain extended with 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate M44 (Entry 193, Table 3) to give double hydrophilic-hydrophilic AB diblock glycopolymers after deprotection of the sugar moieties (TFA/H 2 O 5:1 v/v, RT, 1 h).…”
Section: (Meth)acrylate Monomersmentioning
confidence: 67%