2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1498184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retaining the Thin Blue Line: What Shapes Workerss Willingness Not to Quit the Current Work Environment?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is confirmed that work life balance has a negative impact on turnover intention [14]. Employees who perceive higher levels of balance in their work and life have lower intention to quit [27]. On the other hand, studies have confirmed that work-family conflict increases employees' intention to quit [25].…”
Section: Wlb and Turnover Intentionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is confirmed that work life balance has a negative impact on turnover intention [14]. Employees who perceive higher levels of balance in their work and life have lower intention to quit [27]. On the other hand, studies have confirmed that work-family conflict increases employees' intention to quit [25].…”
Section: Wlb and Turnover Intentionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is no value to the amount of pay an employee receives when he has no time out of the organization to spend the money [14]. The happier the employees are in their personal life, the happier they are at work [27]. It is confirmed that work life balance has a negative impact on turnover intention [14].…”
Section: Wlb and Turnover Intentionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Extant literature indicates that employee intention to quit is a widely researched construct due to its significance to organizational success and employee productivity. Intention to quit has been investigated both from a new hire (Taris et al, 2006;Gkorezis and Kastritsi, 2017) and experienced employee perspectives (Purani and Sahadev, 2008;Griffeth et al, 2000;Gächter et al, 2013). Past studies also investigated the antecedents of employees intention to quit, such as the absence of job satisfaction, job commitment (Firth et al, 2004;Griffin and Moorhead, 2011), social stressors (Harris et al, 2009;Jawahar, 2002), locus of control (Firth et al, 2004;Rahim and Psenicka, 1996), emotional dissonance (Abraham, 1999), and job boredom or work-related boredom (Fisher, 1993;Gkorezis and Kastritsi, 2017).…”
Section: The Mediating Role Of Work-related Boredommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although empirical research on employees' intention to quit is growing (Fisher, 1993;Griffeth et al, 2000;Firth et al, 2004;Taris et al, 2006;Purani and Sahadev, 2008;Griffin and Moorhead, 2011;Gkorezis and Kastritsi, 2017;Gächter et al, 2013), more studies are required given the Generation Z entering the workforce. There is a dearth of empirical studies on Generation Z because very little is known about their workplace expectations and intentions to quit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some organizations, for example, there is a minimal need of raw materials, while others depend entirely on their continuous supply. Meanwhile, some of the resources to be a higher level of requirements than others, which means that there will be a more competitive company, trying to ensure their supply (Gachter, Savage, & Torgler, 2013).…”
Section: Relationships Between Working Environment In the Organizatiomentioning
confidence: 99%