Retained second twin secondary to an undiagnosed bicornuate uterus in a poorly supervised labour: A case report

Abstract

Congenital anomalies of the uterus may result from maldevelopment, abnormal fusion or failure of recanalisation of the paramesonephric (Müllerian) ducts. They are uncommon and are associated with various fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Uterine anomalies have been associated with infertility and pregnancy-related complications. Some cases of successful pregnancies among women with a bicornuate uterus have been reported. However, successful twin pregnancy in a bicornuate uterus is very rare. We report the case of a 24-year-old primigravida who presented with a retained second twin secondary to an undiagnosed bicornuate uterus. An abdominal examination revealed an enlarged abdomen with the uterus tilted to the right and also a palpable firm mass on the left iliac fossa. The retained foetus was presenting cephalic, and the foetal heart rate was 118 bpm. A diagnosis of a retained second twin secondary to a suspected uterine anomaly and suspected foetal distress was made. An emergency caesarean section revealed two horns of the uterus, each having a fallopian tube, an ovary and a cervix. Both cervices opened into one vagina. A 3.0 kg live male baby was successfully delivered through a transverse incision on the lower segment of the right horn of the uterus. The client had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home together with her babies after 4 days. In conclusion, congenital anomalies of the uterus should be considered in cases of a retained second twin. A prompt and accurate diagnosis followed by appropriate management will go a long way in ensuring a good outcome, as was had in this case.

Pregnancy outcome in a bicornuate uterus with bilateral pregnancy presenting as threatened abortion: a case report

“…The incidence is higher in patients taking ovulation induction drugs. 3 Early ultrasound is a contributing method for evaluation of the effects of abnormal uterus on pregnancy. 3D-TVS has sensitivity of 96.7% and specificity of 100%, whereas 2D-TVS has sensitivity of 50-75% and specificity of 95%.4 In this case report, USG could not identify the uterine anomaly in first pregnancy, probably because of small size of uterine horn or improper imaging.…”