Retained Nitrate, Hydrated Sulfates, and Carbonaceous Mass in Federal Reference Method Fine Particulate Matter for Six Eastern U.S. Cities

Abstract

Material balance of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) measured with the Federal Reference Method (FRM) is developed for one rural and five urban locations in the eastern half of the United States using routine Speciation Trends Network (STN) and FRM chemical measurements and thermodynamic models. The Aerosol Inorganics Model is used to estimate retained particle bound water, and an ammonium nitrate evaporation model is used to estimate nitrate concentrations retained on the Teflon-membrane filter of the FRM. To address large uncertainties in carbonaceous mass calculated from STN carbon measurements, retained carbonaceous mass is derived by material balance between PM 2.5 FRM mass and estimates of its non-carbon constituents. The resulting sulfate, adjusted nitrate, derived water, inferred carbonaceous material balance approach (SANDWICH) is compared with reconstructed fine mass (RCFM) using the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments monitoring program equation. For this study, the SANDWICH method resulted in ϳ21-27% higher sulfate mass and ϳ24 -85% lower nitrate mass. The combined mass associated with sulfates and nitrates, however, are well within Ϯ10% of the proportion derived using the more traditional RCFM method. The discrepancies between SANDWICH and measurement-derived carbonaceous mass vary from Ϫ21% to ϩ56% on an annual basis and are attributed in part to urban-rural source influences and uncertainties in estimating FRMretained carbonaceous mass.

Long-term particulate matter modeling for health effect studies in California – Part 1: Model performance on temporal and spatial variations

“…There are a total of 66 PM 2.5 federal reference method (FRM) sites covered in the 4 km domains. Frank (2006) found that FRM PM 2.5 mass measured using STN monitors was within ±30 % of reconstructed fine mass concentrations measured using IMPROVE monitors.…”

Uncertainties in PM2.5 Gravimetric and Speciation Measurements and What We Can Learn from Them

“…Ammonium nitrate and other semivolatiles, such as some organic species, are, in part, lost during sampling, whereas, on the other hand, measured mass includes particle-bound water associated with hygroscopic species such as sulfates, nitrates, sea salt, and possibly some organic species. 6 Furthermore, some species may react with atmospheric gases, which tend to contribute to a positive artifact. Conditions under which filter substrates are shipped as well as on-site storage practices can also affect retention and evolution of collected aerosol material.…”

New York State Urban and Rural Measurements of Continuous PM2.5 Mass by FDMS, TEOM, and BAM

“…The FRM captures a fraction, but not all, of the volatile components of the aerosol mass. 14 The FRM mass is greater than the standard TEOM mass, but less than the FDMS mass. The FDMS was designed to capture both the volatile and nonvolatile components of the aerosol mass.…”