2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retained austenite stability investigation in TRIP steel using neutron diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2a further indicates that the effective hardening increases with the initial austenitic volume fraction of the sample, since a sample with a larger initial austenitic volume fraction eventually has more martensite in the microstructure. The phenomenon described above has also been observed experimentally by Zrník et al [3,30] and Jacques et al, [31] where the effect of the initial austenitic volume fraction on the effective stress-strain response of TRIP steels was measured by neutron diffraction analysis. As can be observed in Figure 2b, samples with a larger initial austenitic volume fraction, in general, correspond to a higher rate of transformation (as indicated by the slope of the curves).…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Austenitic Volume Fraction (Phase Morphology)supporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 2a further indicates that the effective hardening increases with the initial austenitic volume fraction of the sample, since a sample with a larger initial austenitic volume fraction eventually has more martensite in the microstructure. The phenomenon described above has also been observed experimentally by Zrník et al [3,30] and Jacques et al, [31] where the effect of the initial austenitic volume fraction on the effective stress-strain response of TRIP steels was measured by neutron diffraction analysis. As can be observed in Figure 2b, samples with a larger initial austenitic volume fraction, in general, correspond to a higher rate of transformation (as indicated by the slope of the curves).…”
Section: Effect Of Initial Austenitic Volume Fraction (Phase Morphology)supporting
confidence: 75%
“…[32,33] Despite this restriction, the predictions of the model show a relatively good agreement with experimentally observed trends related to the role of various microstructural parameters in TRIP-assisted steels. [3,[5][6][7]9,30,31] More significantly, the present analysis allows to directly attribute overall mechanical characteristics to the corresponding microstructural parameters, which is a difficult task to perform experimentally.…”
Section: Effect Of Austenitic Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary reason for the limited data availability in the literature is that retained austenite, being a metastable phase, cannot be studied in a discrete and independent manner without high-end instrumentation such as synchrotron radiation or neutron diffraction. However, the development of and recent advances in neutron sources have greatly enabled discrete studies at the lattice level that can help in understanding the transformation behavior of individual phases during tensile [9], torsion [10] and cyclic fatigue [11] testing. Neutrons penetrate deeper into the substrate, allowing characterization at the subsurface level that cannot be achieved using any other non-destructive techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…martensite and carbides can be present in some cases [2,3]. Improvements in mechanical properties of TRIP-assisted steels are related to relationships between chemical composition and microstructure (grain size, phase morphology and others) and stability of the retained austenite [4]. The stabilization of austenite at room temperature is enhanced by carbon enrichment during heat treatment [5].…”
Section: Trip (Transformation Induced Plasticity) Assisted Steels Belmentioning
confidence: 99%