2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3387659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retail Shareholder Participation in the Proxy Process: Monitoring, Engagement, and Voting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, shareholders who intentionally ask for full packages of proxy materials are much more likely to vote than are those to whom the corporation chooses to send or not to send reference materials. This converges with observations by a few authors such as Tanaka (2015) and Brav et al (2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, shareholders who intentionally ask for full packages of proxy materials are much more likely to vote than are those to whom the corporation chooses to send or not to send reference materials. This converges with observations by a few authors such as Tanaka (2015) and Brav et al (2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…None of the executives doubted this observation. In particular, we confirm the finding of Brav et al (2019) that retail shareholders tend to vote when they receive more information from the corporation about the agenda and the forthcoming resolutions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, retail shareholders hold much fewer shares of a given …rm. Moreover, the dispersion of shareholdings among retail shareholders is substantial (Brav et al 2019). 2 In the 19th century most corporations used to restrict the voting power of any given shareholder; with many of them employing one-person-one-vote mechanisms (see, e.g., Hansmann and Pargendler 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%