1992
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(92)90067-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retail pricing and the costs of clearance sales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Giulietti and Waterson (1997) offer a multi-product retail pricing model similar to Bliss (1988) which admits the possibility of loss-leaders, but use this model to explain only continuous price variation and not periodic sales. Epstein (1988), on the other hand, develops a multi-product version of van Praag and Bode (1992) in which he maintains the dominant rationale for sales among fashion goods is the ability of sales among some goods to increase demand for others. Without relying as explicitly on potential complementarity, McAfee (1985) presents a multi-product version of Burdett and Judd's (1983) price dispersion model.…”
Section: Rationale For Price Promotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giulietti and Waterson (1997) offer a multi-product retail pricing model similar to Bliss (1988) which admits the possibility of loss-leaders, but use this model to explain only continuous price variation and not periodic sales. Epstein (1988), on the other hand, develops a multi-product version of van Praag and Bode (1992) in which he maintains the dominant rationale for sales among fashion goods is the ability of sales among some goods to increase demand for others. Without relying as explicitly on potential complementarity, McAfee (1985) presents a multi-product version of Burdett and Judd's (1983) price dispersion model.…”
Section: Rationale For Price Promotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, J n } in period n. These include -monetary loss due to anticipated damage and shrinkage in period n ‫ס‬ GQH a,n (d ‫ם‬ u)C; -inventory holding cost incurred in period n ‫ס‬ Max((I a,,n ‫מ‬ D nj ), 0) hW n ; -inventory stockout cost incurred in period n ‫ס‬ Max((D nj ‫מ‬ I a,,n ), 0) kW n ; -cost of a markdown action ‫ס‬ Ax n W n‫מ‬ 1 , where A denotes the fixed cost incurred every time a markdown is taken, for example, the costs of in-store display rearrangements, putting up sale signs, and so forth, while x n ‫ס‬ 1 when P nj Ͻ P n‫1מ‬ and x n ‫ס‬ 0 when P nj Ն P n‫1מ‬ . Such markdown implementation costs can become quite significant when a large number of stores in a retail chain are involved [Robins 1993] and can possibly influence their number, timing, and magnitudes [Van Praag and Bode 1992]. The discount factor W here is subscripted by n ‫מ‬ 1 assuming that markdown costs are incurred just before the period in which they are applied.…”
Section: Inventory Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-low pricing and the``sales'' The economics literature has offered both econometric models and empirical studies which address possible causes of, or motives for, holding``sales''. The motives include intertemporal price discrimination to skim the consumer surplus (van Praag and Bode, 1992), clearance, fashion life cycles and pricing uncertainty (Lazear, 1986;Pashigian, 1988), generating price confusion (Varian, 1980) and peak load pricing (Pashigian and Bowen, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%