2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retail market policy for distribution systems in presence of DERs and microgrids: comparison of sequential and simultaneous settlement of energy and reactive power markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of transformation are presented in Appendix. Theorem 3.2: Consider voltage and frequency dynamic equations of DERs, using the controller which is presented in (15), simultaneously distributed leader-follower fault detection and fault tolerant control can be achieved, if for i = 1, ..., n the MOO problem formulated in (12) with the appropriate dimension variables and matrices is satisfied. Due to the similarity with Theorem 3.1, the details and proof of the theorem have been omitted.…”
Section: B Robust Distributed Fault-tolerant Control Of Voltage and Frequency Of Mgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Details of transformation are presented in Appendix. Theorem 3.2: Consider voltage and frequency dynamic equations of DERs, using the controller which is presented in (15), simultaneously distributed leader-follower fault detection and fault tolerant control can be achieved, if for i = 1, ..., n the MOO problem formulated in (12) with the appropriate dimension variables and matrices is satisfied. Due to the similarity with Theorem 3.1, the details and proof of the theorem have been omitted.…”
Section: B Robust Distributed Fault-tolerant Control Of Voltage and Frequency Of Mgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary layer should compensate for the steadystate errors of frequency and voltage due to the primary control [12], [13]. In contrast, the tertiary control level's main task is power flow optimization and unit commitment [14], [15]. Lately, various features of distributed secondary control of MG such as fixed-time communication delays [16], event-triggered control [17], nonuniform timevarying communication delays [18], resiliency to relative state-dependent noises [19], resiliency to uncertain communications [20], resilient synchronization of voltage/frequency under deception attacks [21], the resilient H ∞ consensusbased control for uncertain time-delayed communication [13] have been addressed in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey in [16] presents a review of both LOC-based and OPF-based methods for reactive power pricing schemes. These can loosely be distinguished into three categories as described in [17] based on the relationship between real and reactive power pricing. The first category includes the cost-based methods mentioned above that keep reactive power as an independent ancillary service.…”
Section: Technical Solutions For Reactive-power Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second category proposed in [17] includes a hierarchical approach where the first step is the clearing of a real power market followed by a reactive power market. These solutions leverage the advantages of decoupled dynamics leading to simple market-based approaches.…”
Section: Technical Solutions For Reactive-power Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%