2018
DOI: 10.1086/695476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retail Globalization and Household Welfare: Evidence from Mexico

Abstract: The arrival of global retail chains in developing countries is causing a radical transformation in the way that households source their consumption. This paper draws on a new collection of Mexican microdata to estimate the effect of foreign supermarket entry on household welfare. The richness of the microdata allows us to estimate a general expression for the gains from retail FDI, and to decompose these gains into several distinct channels. We find that foreign retail entry causes large and significant welfar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
122
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(40 reference statements)
8
122
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Consumers, particularly less affluent ones and almost exclusively those with cars, are willing to travel significantly farther to shop at club stores rather than traditional supermarkets. This accords with the empirical analysis of Lagakos (2016), who finds that car ownership alone explains roughly two thirds of the cross‐country differences in the relative use of modern (and far more efficient) big‐box retail technologies, and provides further evidence that the benefits of these innovations may be regressive (Lagakos, 2016; Atkin, Faber, and Gonzalez‐Navarro, 2018; Eizenberg, Lach, and Yiftach, 2016), perhaps even leaving some transportation‐constrained consumers un‐served. The greater spatial reach enjoyed by club stores also has direct implications for merger policy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Consumers, particularly less affluent ones and almost exclusively those with cars, are willing to travel significantly farther to shop at club stores rather than traditional supermarkets. This accords with the empirical analysis of Lagakos (2016), who finds that car ownership alone explains roughly two thirds of the cross‐country differences in the relative use of modern (and far more efficient) big‐box retail technologies, and provides further evidence that the benefits of these innovations may be regressive (Lagakos, 2016; Atkin, Faber, and Gonzalez‐Navarro, 2018; Eizenberg, Lach, and Yiftach, 2016), perhaps even leaving some transportation‐constrained consumers un‐served. The greater spatial reach enjoyed by club stores also has direct implications for merger policy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This paper relates and contributes to the recent literature on trade and development (e.g., Topalova 2010;Donaldson 2018;Atkin, Faber, and Gonzalez-Navarro 2018). Relative to the existing literature, we focus on tourism, an important and fast-growing but so far understudied facet of globalization in developing countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Appendix C.2 provides some direct evidence to support this claim based on an alternative data source, the Economist Intelligence Unit 34 CityData. 21 A recent paper by Atkin et al (2016) uses a rich collection of barcode, store, and household-level data in Mexico over 2011-2014 to show that (i) products with identical barcodes are 12% cheaper in foreign-owned stores compared to domestically-owned stores; and (ii) higher-income households spend a higher fraction of their retail expenditure in foreign stores. How are these observations reconciled with the evidence in Table A1 that the poor pay lower prices within product categories?…”
Section: Distribution Margins and Consumption Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since richer households tend to buy higher-quality varieties, this is consistent with the observation that higherpriced varieties are consumed by the high-income households. Second, even for identical (barcode-level) products the analysis in Atkin et al (2016) does not establish that the poor actually pay more than the rich. Their estimated coefficient reflects the average price difference between all foreign-and non-foreign-owned stores.…”
Section: Distribution Margins and Consumption Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation