2009
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009-92-327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resurgence of Infant Caregiving Responses

Abstract: Two experiments were conducted to identify the conditions likely to produce resurgence among adult human participants. The preparation was a simulated caregiving context, wherein a recorded infant cry sounded and was terminated contingent upon targeted caregiving responses. Results of Experiment 1 demonstrated resurgence with human participants in this negative reinforcement preparation. Results of Experiment 2 showed that responses with a longer history of reinforcement showed a stronger resurgence effect rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
128
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
16
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon is known as behavioral resurgence (e.g., Cleland, Foster, & Temple, 2000;Epstein, 1983Epstein, , 1985Reed & Morgan, 2006, and it has been demonstrated to occur in human participants (see Bruzek, Thompson, & Peters, 2009;Doughty, Cash, Finch, Holloway, & Wallington, 2010;Pettenger, Pavlik, Flora, & Kontos, 1988;Reed & Clark, 2011;Sajwah, Twardosz, & Burke, 1972). Resurgent responses sometimes have proven to be useful, for example, in problem-solving responses; if one response fails, it often is useful to revert to previously successful responses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is known as behavioral resurgence (e.g., Cleland, Foster, & Temple, 2000;Epstein, 1983Epstein, , 1985Reed & Morgan, 2006, and it has been demonstrated to occur in human participants (see Bruzek, Thompson, & Peters, 2009;Doughty, Cash, Finch, Holloway, & Wallington, 2010;Pettenger, Pavlik, Flora, & Kontos, 1988;Reed & Clark, 2011;Sajwah, Twardosz, & Burke, 1972). Resurgent responses sometimes have proven to be useful, for example, in problem-solving responses; if one response fails, it often is useful to revert to previously successful responses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generality of laboratory animal research findings has been supported by research examining resurgence in children with intellectual or developmental disabilities (e.g., Volkert et al, 2009, Wacker et al, 2011; Wacker et al, 2013), and in typically functioning adult participants (e.g., Dixon & Hayes, 1998; Doughty, Cash, Finch, Holloway, & Wallington, 2010; Doughty, Kastner, & Bismark, 2011; Bruzek, Thompson, & Peters, 2009; Mechner, Hyten, Field, & Madden, 1997; Wilson & Hayes, 1996). For example, research with laboratory animals has shown increased time in extinction plus alternative reinforcement may decrease subsequent resurgence (Leitenberg et al, 1975, Experiment 4; Sweeney & Shahan, 2013a; but see Winterbauer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, researchers examining the resurgence of problem behavior following alternative reinforcement treatment in children with intellectual disabilities found an overall decrease in resurgence as function of increased exposure to extinction plus alternative reinforcement treatment (Wacker et al 2011). Another commonality is that increased length of baseline reinforcement is related to more robust resurgence in both animal research (Winterbauer et al, 2013) and in laboratory research with typically functioning adult humans (Bruzek et al, 2009; Doughty et al, 2011). The general agreement of animal and human resurgence findings is promising for future translational research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; (3) If resurgence is the reappearance of a previously reinforced sequence that is later extinguished, which role would the reinforcement of S1 play if sequences never reinforced can be induced in greater magnitude than S1 itself? These questions require methodological refinement in resurgence studies (i.e., the measurement of control responses, as was done by some authors such as Bachá-Méndez et al, 2007;Bishop, 2008;Bruzek et al, 2009;Reed & Morgan, 2006;Sanchéz-Carrasco & Nieto, 2005;Sweeney & Shahan, 2013;Villas-Bôas, 2006) as well as a conceptual review of resurgence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in the Testing Phase R2, as well as R1, produces no reinforcer. The reappearance of R1, despite the absence of programmed reinforcers, characterizes resurgence (Bruzek, Thompson & Peters, 2009;Epstein, 1985;Sweeney & Shahan, 2016). Variations of this procedure have shown that resurgence occurs not only when R2 is extinguished, but also when there is a reduction in the frequency (Lieving & Lattal, 2003) and delay (Jarmolowicz & Lattal, 2014) of reinforcers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%