1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(81)73140-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Résumé of a seminar on endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy (ERS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Failed cannulation happens even in experienced hands [12,13]. The reasons for failed ERCP include anatomic variation (eg Billroth II anastomosis), obstructive processes that preclude access to the duodenum and major papilla, complete obstruction of the duct of interest, inadequate patient sedation, poor patient tolerance of endoscopy, and lack of endosopic expertise [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Failed cannulation happens even in experienced hands [12,13]. The reasons for failed ERCP include anatomic variation (eg Billroth II anastomosis), obstructive processes that preclude access to the duodenum and major papilla, complete obstruction of the duct of interest, inadequate patient sedation, poor patient tolerance of endoscopy, and lack of endosopic expertise [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure rate for cannulation of the duct of interest at ERCP ranges from 5% to 15% [12,13]. Depending on clinical indications, a failed first attempt may lead to a repeat examination, an alternative diagnostic test, or follow-up clinical evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most patients, EPS with or without a biliary sphincterotomy via the major or minor papilla is performed to facilitate removal of pancreatic stones. The MPD stones are often impacted and difficult to extract, but up to 50% of MPD stones can be removed effectively by standard techniques, including endoscopic sphincterotomy or stone retrieval with a balloon, basket, and/or forceps alone [90,101,[118][119][120]. Endoscopic stent placement, mechanical lithotripsy, intracorporeal lithotripsy with a pulse-dye laser, or electrohydraulic lithotripsy, are other possibilities [90,[121][122][123][124][125].…”
Section: Pancreatic Duct Stonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the end of 1973, the confidence of the endoscopists using the transpapillary route had increased, which brought about the development of a new therapeutic approach, the impact of which was tremendous from the beginning: endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) [1,4]. Its high success rate (85%-95%), the low morbidity (3%-10%) and mortality (0.4%-1.0%) rates ( [2]; A. Montori, V.R. Buccino, L. Masoni, unpublished work), independent of the patient's general condition and/or associated diseases, makes it preferable to server the sphincter of Oddi via endoscopy in high-risk or emergency (acute biliary pancreatitis, septic cholangitis) cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buccino, L. Masoni, unpublished work), independent of the patient's general condition and/or associated diseases, makes it preferable to server the sphincter of Oddi via endoscopy in high-risk or emergency (acute biliary pancreatitis, septic cholangitis) cases. Restenosis does not represent a problem, as it ranges from 1% to 2% [2]. Moreover, ES has become an alternative to surgery in the elective treatment of residual stones, even if the method-related complications appear to be similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%