Results of zinc deprivation in daphnid culture

Abstract-Daphnia magna is widespread in many freshwater systems of temperate regions and frequently is used to test metal toxicity. Recently, studies have been performed to determine metal biokinetics and development of tolerance in this important zooplankton species. In the present paper, we review the recent progress in these areas and suggest possible directions for future studies. Substantial differences exist in aqueous uptake, dietary assimilation, and elimination of several metals (Cd, Se, Zn, Ag, Hg, and MeHg) by D. magna. The routes of uptake are metal-specific, with Se and MeHg being accumulated predominantly through diet. All metals except Ag can be biomagnified from algae to D. magna, providing that metal concentrations in algae and algal food density are relatively low. Methylmercury is biomagnified in all situations. As a route for metal elimination in D. magna, maternal transfer is especially important for Se, Zn, and MeHg. On the other hand, the effect of single-generation exposure to metals on D. magna is very different from multigeneration exposure, which often results in a significantly higher metal tolerance. Moreover, D. magna easily loses metal tolerance developed through long-term exposure. Recovery from metal stress can temporarily increase the sensitivity of D. magna to metal toxicity. Finally, metallothionein-like protein is responsible for minimizing metal toxicity in D. magna. The results inferred from these studies can be extrapolated to other aquatic invertebrates as well as to other pollutants in the aquatic environment.

Section: Multigeneration Pre-exposurementioning

confidence: 99%

Biokinetics and tolerance development of toxic metals in Daphnia magna

Tsui

Wang

2007

“…For example, organisms used in laboratory toxicity tests are often cultured in media containing very low essential micronutrient concentrations, which can lead to deficiency and oversensitivity compared to field populations (e.g., copper in algal culture medium of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development is only 50 ng/L, which is barely sufficient for the algae to grow; C. Janssen and G. Persoone, personal communication). Zinc deficiency can skew toxicity test results [64][65][66].…”

Section: Overprotectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Whole effluent toxicity testing—usefulness, level of protection, and risk assessment

Chapman¹

2000

164

The general status of whole effluent toxicity (WET) tests is assessed relative to their generally accepted purpose of identifying, characterizing, and eliminating toxic effects of effluents on aquatic resources. Although WET tests are useful, they are not perfect tools (no perfect tools exist). Imperfections include the innate variability of these tests, due both to biotic and anthropogenic factors; the reality of species differences both between the laboratory and the field and within the field; and differences between the laboratory and the receiving environment. Whole effluent toxicity tests may be overprotective (because of their conservative nature, the absence of environmental and ecological processes that could ameliorate exposure, and sensitivity to noncontaminant effects), underprotective (because the most sensitive species cannot be tested, multiple stresses tend to be present in the receiving environment, and failure to account for food chain effects or all possible endpoints), or offer an uncertain level of protection (intermittent doses and mixtures in the environment, adaptations, and hormesis). The implication of hormesis and inverted U‐shaped dose responses for WET testing are reviewed in particular detail. Comparisons to field conditions indicate that WET tests are not reliable predictors of effects or lack of effects in the receiving environment. Whole effluent toxicity tests are only the first stage in a risk assessment and as such identify hazard, not risk. Identification of risk requires discarding the concept of independent applicability. The appropriate use of WET tests is identified in the context of their advantages and disadvantages.

“…The effect of acclimation duration on subsequent responses also is not well documented. According to Kuwabara and Leland [9] and Caffrey and Keating [16], ultimate acclimation effects were observed after 20 generations for Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Daphnia pulex, respectively. The first authors indicated that the initial effects could be observed within the first five generations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Influence of multigeneration acclimation to copper on tolerance, energy reserves, and homeostasis of Daphnia magna Straus

Bossuyt

Janssen

2004

A multigeneration acclimation experiment was performed with Daphnia magna exposed to copper to assess possible changes in tolerance and to establish the optimal concentration range (OCEE) of this species. The hypothesis was tested that as the bioavailable background concentration of an essential metal increases (within realistic limits), the natural tolerance (to the metal) of the acclimated/adapted organisms and communities will increase. During 18 months the daphnids were exposed to six different, environmentally relevant, copper background concentrations ranging between 0.5 and 100 microg Cu L(-1) (7 x 10(-15) and 3.7 x 10(-9) M Cu2+). An increase in acute (effect concentration resulting in 50% immobility: 48-h EC50) and chronic copper (effect concentration resulting in 50% or 10% reproduction reduction: 21-d EC50, 21-d EC10) tolerance was observed with increasing exposure concentration. The 48-h EC50 increased significantly from 204 +/- 24 microg Cu L(-1) to 320 +/- 43 microg Cu L(-1). A nonsignificant change from 48.0 (47.9-48.0) microg Cu L(-1) to 78.8 (66.3-93.6) microg Cu L(-1) was noted in the chronic toxicity assays. The optimal concentration range was assessed using different biological parameters (i.e., net reproduction [R0]), energy reserves (Ea), body length measurements, filtration rates, and body burdens. After three generations of acclimation the OCEE ranged between 1 and 35 microg Cu L(-1) (2 X 10(-14) to 80 x 10(-12) M Cu2+). Body burden measurements revealed an active copper regulation up to 35 microg Cu L(-1) (80 pM Cu2+). It can be concluded that acclimation of D. magna to copper does occur in laboratory experiments, even at realistic copper background concentrations (10(-11) - 10(-9) M Cu2+). However, it is suggested that this phenomenon is of less importance in the context of regulatory risk assessments. An optimal copper concentration range for D. magna was observed between 1 and 35 microg Cu L(-1) (10(-14) - 10(-11) M Cu2+), indicating that copper deficiency can occur in routine laboratory cultures.