2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of polidocanol endovenous microfoam in clinical practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of truncal vein treatments involve foam polidocanol with a concentration ranging from 1% to 3%. The hyperpigmentation rates reported by all RCTs and non‐RCTs during this analysis (liquid and foam) were 7%–45.8% for polidocanol 1%, 21–26 16%–17% for polidocanol 2% 27,28 and 7.4%–32.5% for polidocanol 3% 21,22,24,25,28–30 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of truncal vein treatments involve foam polidocanol with a concentration ranging from 1% to 3%. The hyperpigmentation rates reported by all RCTs and non‐RCTs during this analysis (liquid and foam) were 7%–45.8% for polidocanol 1%, 21–26 16%–17% for polidocanol 2% 27,28 and 7.4%–32.5% for polidocanol 3% 21,22,24,25,28–30 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Most sclerotherapies with 0.5%–3% polidocanol were performed using the Tessari method for foam production (10 studies). One study used Turbofoam for foam generation, 22 and another used polidocanol endovenous microfoam 1% 26 . Regarding the type of gas used for foam production, one study compared air‐based foam and CO 2 ‐based foam and reported significantly less hyperpigmentation in the CO 2 group ( p ‐value < 0.0001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The full-text reading and application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies in the present systematic review. We excluded 65 studies for the following reasons (Appendix 2): reviews with overlapping data, 7,8 primary outcome not reported, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] not written in English, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] conference abstracts, overlapping data with an already included report by same author, 56 data not yet available, 57 full text not available, 58 no distinction between primary and secondary AASV incompetence, 59 no distinction in outcome between GSVand AASV, 60-62 and other outcome. [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71] A flow chart of the selection procedure is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%